Hello,
I'm looking for a public looking glass / route server connected to
Internap - preferably in Los Angeles. Does such a thing exist?
Thanks,
Max
> I'm looking for a public looking glass / route server connected to
> Internap - preferably in Los Angeles. Does such a thing exist?
similar subject, so excuse my piggybacking
i am looking for looking glass softwhere which will run against junos,
ios, and ios xr, so folk playing in the rpki orig
Internap do not have an external Looking Glass (not sure about Route Server,
but I suspect it's the same).
If you're a customer their helpdesk will run traceroutes/etc from a specific
location if you ask, within reason of course...
Scott.
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Max Clark wrote:
>
On 2010.05.01 12:41, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I'm looking for a public looking glass / route server connected to
>> Internap - preferably in Los Angeles. Does such a thing exist?
>
> similar subject, so excuse my piggybacking
>
> i am looking for looking glass softwhere which will run against junos,
Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
providing a complete internet table to customers?
Waive the surcharge for sufficiently large commits?
On 5/1/2010 13:43, ML wrote:
> Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
> providing a complete internet table to customers?
>
I've never heard of nor experienced that before.
~Seth
Never heard of it. We don't do it.
--Original Message--
From: ML
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?
Sent: May 1, 2010 3:43 PM
Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
providing a complete internet table to customers?
Waive the s
On 2010.05.01 16:43, ML wrote:
> Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
> providing a complete internet table to customers?
... I've never heard of it, but iow, I'd pay more if I could get my
upstreams to provide the full table...
Is there a market? I doubt it.
Steve
On May 1, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.05.01 16:43, ML wrote:
>> Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
>> providing a complete internet table to customers?
>
> ... I've never heard of it, but iow, I'd pay more if I could get my
> upstreams to provide
On 2010.05.01 17:42, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.05.01 16:43, ML wrote:
>> Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
>> providing a complete internet table to customers?
>
> ... I've never heard of it, but iow, I'd pay more if I could get my
> upstreams to provide the ful
I've never heard of this either.
-jim
--Original Message--
From: aa...@wholesaleinternet.net
To: ML
To: nanog@nanog.org
ReplyTo: aa...@wholesaleinternet.net
Subject: Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?
Sent: May 1, 2010 6:00 PM
Never heard of it. We don't do it.
--Original
Is there anyone from Google on the list that can contact me off list
to help with a "blocked" domain issue?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Joe Hamby
Do you mean "Full routes" for BGP ?
Sometimes there are extra charge for BGP, but never heard about full
routes or not.
How can they guarantee whether they provide Full routes or not ?
If some routes are missing, are they going to provide the credit for it ?
Full routes from BGP is always best-
We provide full tables to customers that ask, 99% of the time they don't know
what they are asking for and don't really need it. full tables doesn't cost
anything more but we only do it for our 100+meg customers. I don't for example
do BGP with T1 level customers.
-Matt
- Original Messag
14 matches
Mail list logo
