>> Replace all the routers on the Internet with stateful firewalls. What
>> happens?
> the same thing that happened with flow-cached routers, they melt, you go
> out of business, the end.^
a bunch of us LOAO, ^
there are no data in the report, just OK lines with no numbers. and
clicking the links on the lines gave me docs not numbers. bring back
the old version!
macosx 10.6.2
firefox 3.5.7
randy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> there are no data in the report, just OK lines with no numbers. and
> clicking the links on the lines gave me docs not numbers. bring back
> the old version!
>
> macosx 10.6.2
> firefox 3.5.7
>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Randy Bush wrote:
there are no data in the report, just OK lines with no numbers. and
clicking the links on the lines gave me docs not numbers. bring back
the old version!
macosx 10.6.2
firefox 3.5.7
still there, just hiding.
click the + sign at the top to "expand all".
Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Jan 10, 2010, at 1:22 PM, harbor235 wrote:
Again, a firewall has it's place just like any other device in the network, defense
in>>> depth is a prudent philosophy to reduce the chances of compromise, it does
not>>>eliminate it nor does any architecture you can th
We just lost Cogent across the country, along with several sister companies.
Can't get through to a support person. Any idea what's going on?
Joe Johnson
Chief Information Officer
Riverside Consulting Group, Ltd.
Phone: 708.442.6033 x3456
Fax: 708.442.9722
j...@riversidecg.com
www.riversidecg.com
Hello,
Our 100Mb Metro-E link is up and running just fine... We are fed out of
their San Francisco, CA facility.
However, this is posted on the Cogent Status page:
**
** Cogent Network Status Report Last Updated Thu
Sitting on hold with them now. We lost them completely in Kansas City for
about 5 minutes. We're back but connectivity through them is spotty. Can't
even resolve google.com. Same with other DCs in the area.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Johnson [mailto:j...@riversidecg.com]
Sent: Thu
Yes there is a Newyork to Philadelphia fiber cut is there
It might not be an outage it might be high latency due to multiple
routes going out via there buffalo POP.
Ketan Mangal
2 Bloor St W, Ste 2004
Toronto, Ontario
M4W 3E2
Toll Free: 1.866.353.9333
Fax: 416.855.7636
Client Services: 416.921.7
Fiber cut in New Jersey, affecting most of the easy coast (per their support
number). I didn't jot the master ticket number down though. Our gear in
Chicago seems partially affected though.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Joe Johnson wrote:
> We just lost Cogent across the country, along with
There is a fiber cut and it's located near Brunswick, NJ
--
Raphaël Maunier
NEO TELECOMS
On Jan 14, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Robert Glover wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Our 100Mb Metro-E link is up and running just fine... We are fed out of
> their San Francisco, CA facility.
>
> However, this is posted
Seems like there may an issue in Chicago, lots of traceroutes bombing
out there.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Johnson [mailto:j...@riversidecg.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:33 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cogent Outage?
We just lost Cogent across the country, along with sev
Lost connectivity to a few thingsNamely google. Kansas City
~J
-Original Message-
From: Robert Glover [mailto:robe...@garlic.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:36 AM
To: Joe Johnson
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Cogent Outage?
Hello,
Our 100Mb Metro-E link is up and runni
Hello,
Internet Pulse shows some bad-mojo right now:
http://www.internetpulse.com/Main.aspx?OriginValue=Cogent&OriginLevel=1
Sincerely,
Bobby Glover
Director of Information Services
South Valley Internet
On 1/14/2010 9:36 AM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
Sitting on hold with them now. We lost them co
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Johnson [mailto:j...@riversidecg.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:31 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Cogent Outage?
>
> We just lost Cogent across the country, along with several
> sister companies. Can't get through to a support person. Any
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> I can now place a checkbox in the "Is there a firewall?" column of the
> audit.
In most cases, you can check the same box if you use an appropriately
designed stateless firewall
instead of an inappropriate stateful firewall.(Not always,
Joe Johnson said:
> We just lost Cogent across the country, along with several sister companies.
> Can't get through to a support person. Any idea what's going on?
We're back up in both Chicago locations, Troy, LA, Dallas, and NY now. Chicago,
Troy, and LA were complete losses for close to 35 min
Ketan Mangal wrote:
Yes there is a Newyork to Philadelphia fiber cut is there
It might not be an outage it might be high latency due to multiple
routes going out via there buffalo POP.
That fiber cut was at 9:30EST this morning, the major Cogent internal
routing problems started around 12:10 a
On Jan 14, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
> Ketan Mangal wrote:
>> Yes there is a Newyork to Philadelphia fiber cut is there It might not be an
>> outage it might be high latency due to multiple
>> routes going out via there buffalo POP.
>
> That fiber cut was at 9:30EST this morning, the
Folks,
My question to the community is: assuming a network based IPv6 to IP4
translator is in place (like NAT64 / DNS64), are IPv6-only Internet
services viable as a product today? In particular, would it be
appropriate for a 3G /smartphone or wireless broadband focused on at
casual (web and ema
On Jan 14, 2010, at 1:53 PM, John Payne wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
>
>> Ketan Mangal wrote:
>>> Yes there is a Newyork to Philadelphia fiber cut is there It might not be
>>> an outage it might be high latency due to multiple
>>> routes going out via there buffalo
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Senie [mailto:d...@senie.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 1:16 PM
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: Cogent Outage?
>
> Indeed. Please keep NANOG clear for inane pontification and religious
> wars regarding firewalls, for non-lawyers arguing the
Unsubscribe
On 1/14/2010 2:00 PM, Burns, Kevin wrote:
Unsubscribe
No!
I just re-subscribed for the fist time in years.
Who are you to tell me to unsubscribe?
--
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to
take everything you have."
Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, t
Hello:
We are going to have the following (simplified scenario):
- vlans 101,102 are going to have servers.
- vlan 101 uses 10.101.101.0/24 addressing and vlan 102 uses
10.102.102.0/24 addressing.
- vlans 101 and 102 doesn't have level 3.
- vlans 201,202 are going to have the level3 interfaces co
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:56:01 -0500, JC Dill wrote:
It's a common belief among network operators that if a "server operator"
doesn't have access/ability to modify the PTR record for a server, it's
a good sign that the server shouldn't be used to send email, but instead
should send email thru
>> there are no data in the report, just OK lines with no numbers. and
>> clicking the links on the lines gave me docs not numbers. bring back
>> the old version!
> still there, just hiding.
> click the + sign at the top to "expand all".
aha! thank you!
randy
On 1/14/2010 11:10, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> My question to the community is: assuming a network based IPv6 to IP4
> translator is in place (like NAT64 / DNS64), are IPv6-only Internet
> services viable as a product today? In particular, would it be
> appropriate for a 3G /smartphone or
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Jim Burwell wrote:
> On 1/14/2010 11:10, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> My question to the community is: assuming a network based IPv6 to IP4
>> translator is in place (like NAT64 / DNS64), are IPv6-only Internet
>> services viable as a product today? In pa
>
> My question to the community is: assuming a network based IPv6 to IP4
> translator is in place (like NAT64 / DNS64), are IPv6-only Internet
> services viable as a product today?
Well, speaking for CERNET2 (2nd Gen. of China Education and Research
Network), it is a "production" network today i
Hello:
As many of you are aware right now, Haiti is in Chaos. This website has been
put up to provide a central repository where relatives from the States can
register information about their loved ones.
Looking at a report that 1And1 has turned-off the site because it is suspected
as a "spam
No offense but let the red cross do its job.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: "Forestal, Andre Jr."
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:09:50
To: NANOG list
Subject: Contact @ 1And1 hosting re: http://www.koneksyon.com/ - URGENT
Hello:
As many of you are aware right
I completely understand, however this website went up since yesterday morning,
way before anything else of its kind went up, and there were already thousands
of entries and folks were already relying on it as a mean to locate loved ones.
It is certainly not a substitute to the registry that the
I'm not sure if it relates to this site, you didn't provide a link to
the report about 1and1
actions but the FBI is very active tracking many sites and hundreds of
domains that
are popping up in several places after the quake and that are a scam.
I'm not saying this site is legit, but just startin
Thanks all for the quick responses. Got what we needed.
for clarification:
This website does not involve any donations at all. It is simply a bulletin
board application that allows US based relatives to post name, last known
location of people in Haiti whom they can not get in touch with. S
Lots of these web sites popping up
http://apps.facebook.com/haiti_survivors
36 matches
Mail list logo
