"Jeffrey I. Schiller" writes:
> An option I saw years ago (I forgot on whose equipment) was a default
> password which was a function of the equipment's serial number. So you
> had to have the algorithm and you needed the serial number which was not
> related to the MAC. So if you didn't have phy
Matthew Palmer [mpal...@hezmatt.org]
> To be fair, he was just asking about factory resetting the device
> because
> the current password was unknown, then reconfiguring the device (I'm
> willing
> to be generous and assume that the reconfiguration included setting a
> new,
> secure password).
Tha
We just had a qwest outage of about 2 mins at 1:41am pst. When I called
to report it I was told it was a 200+ emergency software upgrade due to
a security concern, and that we will get a notice later after the fact.
Normally we get notices in advance, even for software upgrades due to
security
Any other specifics? Got a trouble ticket ID?
I'm located in the NW (Talent, Oregon, just over CA border..) and we
have a few customers on Qwest T1's and the like. We also have a
customer who gets MPLS directly from Q.
We've yet to hear of any outages for our customers - but I suppose the
> We just had a qwest outage of about 2 mins at 1:41am pst. When I called
> to report it I was told it was a 200+ emergency software upgrade due to
> a security concern, and that we will get a notice later after the fact.
> Normally we get notices in advance, even for software upgrades due to
>
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
Which goes to show that they just really don't get it when it comes to
security. Maybe they should look here at all the entries for 'default
credentials':
Actually, should be 'default password'.
Default credentials may be a more generic descriptio
I kind of liked the way the Symantec Vraptor (piece of junk) firewalls used to
do it. Factory reset from the front panel, set addressing and it generates new
passwords displayed on the LCD.
Jason
*** NOTICE--The attached communication contains privileged and confidential
information. If you a
Notices were left at the discretion of Qwest account teams. There was no mass
notification.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 4:04 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: qwest outage no notice
We just had a qwest outage of a
Give the nature of the issue from juniper I am guessing that a large number of
companies were doing upgrades over the last few days as fast as they could.
http://j.mp/8XaReK has the details I know of now.
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:14 AM, Steve Ryan wrote:
> Any other specifics? Got a trouble tick
Once upon a time, Mike said:
> We just had a qwest outage of about 2 mins at 1:41am pst. When I called
> to report it I was told it was a 200+ emergency software upgrade due to
> a security concern, and that we will get a notice later after the fact.
> Normally we get notices in advance, even f
Hi,
I'm searching "something", to secure mount/connect a rj21 cable to a
device.
I have a angled plug like this:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RJ21-female-connector.jpg
It can only be screwed to the device at the top side, and is "loose" at
the down side.
I have seen a type of "kno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:04 AM, Mike wrote:
We just had a qwest outage of about 2 mins at 1:41am pst. When I
called to report it I was told it was a 200+ emergency software
upgrade due to a security concern, and that we will get a notice
later aft
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:06 AM, wrote:
>> We just had a qwest outage of about 2 mins at 1:41am pst. When I called
>> to report it I was told it was a 200+ emergency software upgrade due to
>> a security concern, and that we will get a notice later after the fact.
>> Normally we get notices in adv
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
> I'm searching "something", to secure mount/connect a rj21 cable to a device.
> I have a angled plug like this:
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RJ21-female-connector.jpg
>
> It can only be screwed to the device at the top side, an
We also got email notifications about 'emergency maintenance' on our
Qwest circuits, from their notice:
Reason For Maintenance: EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE TO IMPLEMENT A SOFTWARE
PATCH FOR NETWORK RELIABILITY
Sure sounds like it's all related to the Juniper advisory to me
Dear William,
I'm searching "something", to secure mount/connect a rj21 cable to a device.
I have a angled plug like this:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RJ21-female-connector.jpg
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/01-10/55001-6/55501-56000/55735.jpg
http://www.patentstorm.us/p
At 10:05 AM 1/7/2010, you wrote:
I'm searching "something", to secure mount/connect a rj21 cable to a device.
I have a angled plug like this:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RJ21-female-connector.jpg
It can only be screwed to the device at the top side, and is "loose"
at the down side.
> Dear William,
>
> >> I'm searching "something", to secure mount/connect a rj21 cable to a
> >> device.
> >> I have a angled plug like this:
> >> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RJ21-female-connector.jpg
>
> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/01-10/55001-6/55501-56000/55735.jpg
>
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
We received 7 Juniper Security Advisories today. My guess is that this
is the reason for the Qwest outage you've seen.
Yeah, they refused to notify due to security concerns from what they
told me last night. Notification was performed after maintenance was
complete.
On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:38 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>> Which goes to show that they just really don't get it when it comes to
>> security. Maybe they should look here at all the entries for 'default
>> credentials':
>
> Roland, this isn't
Yeah, they refused to notify due to security concerns from what they
told me last night. Notification was performed after maintenance was
complete.
Ok, so the next question is, what harm would a simple advance notice of
'emergency maintenance' caused, vs the very real hassle and
inconvenie
That should read...
Yeah, they refused to notify due to [marketing] concerns from what they
Richey
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12:04 PM
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: qwest outage no notice
> Yeah, they ref
Has anyone noticed that accessing http://www.he.net or
http://ipv6.he.net is either slow or inaccessible?
Please let me know if you have a different experience currently.
Thanks
- Brian
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the
intended
Mike wrote:
> We just had a qwest outage of about 2 mins at 1:41am pst. When I called
> to report it I was told it was a 200+ emergency software upgrade due to
> a security concern, and that we will get a notice later after the fact.
Hmm - I got notice in advance. I'll have to go search for the em
This is one reason why companies should use twitter...great for those
impromptu emergency messages. Our electrical utility company uses
twitter and I have to admit that it's nice to know what is going on
ahead of time even if it is a short message!
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 10:31 -0700, Chris De Youn
Can't access http://he.net from my location here in Chicago...
traceroute to he.net (216.218.186.2), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.65.44.1 (10.65.44.1) 2.504 ms 1.039 ms 0.653 ms
2 * * *
3 te-2-3-ur04.romeoville.il.chicago.comcast.net (68.86.119.205)
13.648 ms 13.693 ms 13.477
No issues from Toronto area on an HE connection...
-Original Message-
From: Tim Burke [mailto:t...@tburke.us]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: he.net down/slow?
Can't access http://he.net from my location here in Chicago...
traceroute to he.net (
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
> Any ideas where to get this or any other ideas how to get a good
> connection? (retro-fit).
Easy way to solve this is to lace it in place with some no. 9 wax twine.
I do this on most of these connectors, it's more secure then the cheesy
velcro loops.
http://en.wikiped
no issues in Kansas City (area) via Internet2 at 12:10pm Central.
On Jan 7, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Brian Johnson wrote:
Has anyone noticed that accessing http://www.he.net or
http://ipv6.he.net is either slow or inaccessible?
Please let me know if you have a different experience currently.
Thanks
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 11:30 -0600, Brian Johnson wrote:
> Has anyone noticed that accessing http://www.he.net or
> http://ipv6.he.net is either slow or inaccessible?
>
> Please let me know if you have a different experience currently.
It is up here.
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message,
On Jan 7, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
> Has anyone noticed that accessing http://www.he.net or
> http://ipv6.he.net is either slow or inaccessible?
Both are up here from both locations I'm bothered to try (business Comcast,
Net Access Corp MMU).
JS
Brian Johnson wrote:
Has anyone noticed that accessing http://www.he.net or
http://ipv6.he.net is either slow or inaccessible?
We had a 4.1 earthquake here in the SF Bay area at about 10:09 PST.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/nc71336726.php
I believe he.net's p
JC Dill wrote:
> Brian Johnson wrote:
>> Has anyone noticed that accessing http://www.he.net or
>> http://ipv6.he.net is either slow or inaccessible?
>>
>
> We had a 4.1 earthquake here in the SF Bay area at about 10:09 PST.
> http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/nc71336726
I think the he.net problems occurred before the quake...
-Mike
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:56 AM, JC Dill wrote:
> Brian Johnson wrote:
>
>> Has anyone noticed that accessing http://www.he.net or
>> http://ipv6.he.net is either slow or inaccessible?
>>
>>
>
> We had a 4.1 earthquake here in the
On 7 Jan 2010, at 18:18, William Pitcock wrote:
...why would you have that on a mailing list post?
because the mail server that adds it is too dumb to differentiate
between list and direct mail?
f
Probably related to this:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/07/juniper_critical_router_bug/
-Original Message-
From: Chris De Young [mailto:c...@arizona.edu]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 9:32 AM
To: Mike
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: qwest outage no notice
Mike wrote:
> We just ha
Mike Lyon wrote:
I think the he.net problems occurred before the quake...
-Mike
They did. I was looking at what it looked like from here when the
building started swaying.
Matthew Kaufman
I'm in downtown SF and felt nothing.
-j
On Jan 7, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Mike Lyon wrote:
I think the he.net problems occurred before the quake...
-Mike
They did. I was looking at what it looked like from here when the
building started swaying.
Matthew Kaufman
---
Jo
>
> On 7 Jan 2010, at 18:18, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> > ...why would you have that on a mailing list post?
>
> because the mail server that adds it is too dumb to differentiate
> between list and direct mail?
>
> f
Bingo! ;)
- Brian
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, incl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:32 AM, John Adams wrote:
> I'm in downtown SF and felt nothing.
>
I live & work virtually on top of the epicenter of the quake this morning
- -- it was pretty mild, but still caused some dish rattling, building
swaying, etc
Same thing for us in Minnesota. Brief outage and emergency outage notification
came after the outage. The outage window was for 6:00-12:00GMT, and the outage
came at 6:15GMT. We didn't get the notice until 10:30GMT.
Qwest had a major outage over the Xmas weekend in MN. I wonder if this is
rela
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:51:41 CST, Brian Johnson said:
> > On 7 Jan 2010, at 18:18, William Pitcock wrote:
> > > ...why would you have that on a mailing list post?
> > because the mail server that adds it is too dumb to differentiate
> > between list and direct mail?
> Bingo! ;)
That sort of gratu
--- mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote:
From: Mike
Ok, so the next question is, what harm would a simple advance notice of
'emergency maintenance' caused, vs the very real hassle and
inconvenience that DS3-down in the middle of the night caused for
operations staff? I personally was yanked o
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:24:26 -0500, Jeffrey I. Schiller
wrote:
An option I saw years ago (I forgot on whose equipment) was a default
password which was a function of the equipment's serial number. So you
had to have the algorithm and you needed the serial number which was not
related to the MAC
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:13:28 -0500, Nick Hale wrote:
I think the vendor you're thinking of was Cabletron (now Enterasys). I
had to call them and give them the Serial Number for them to provide me
with the default password to the system after a hard reset (this was for
an ELS100-24TXG 'switch').
Nenad Andric wrote:
On Tue Jan 05, 2010 at 01:04:01PM -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Or better:
- Allow from anywhere port 80 to server port > 1023 established
Adding "established" brings us back to stateful firewall!
Not really. It only looks to see if the ACK or RST bits are set. Thi
> While we're on the subject, a lot of leibert gear has a dip switch/jumper
> block to turn passwords off entirely. (of course, that requires physical
> access and a power cycle.)
So do a lot of HP/Compaq servers with integrated lights out management.
Don't think you even need to power cycle (
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Brandon Galbraith
wrote:
> We're looking at using Comcast's (business) transit and private ethernet
> services at several client locations and I wanted to see what experiences
> others have had regarding this. Off-list replies are preferred.
>
> Thanks,
> -brandon
48 matches
Mail list logo
