Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
They've definitely been improving it over the years though, so much that
I almost never trigger a session reset on me unintentionally any more.
They must have. This was new to me and came as a shock. I don't think
I've ever seen my m120 behave any different than m
"Babak Pasdar" wrote on 11/16/2009 02:37:10 PM:
> Could some of you share your recommendations on the best tools for
> monitoring per AS communications. I would like to track all source
> AS to Destination AS traffic utilization.
Another netflow open-source solution is flow-tools/FlowViewer.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> Caveat: no MAC accounting on LAGs (IEEE speak) / Aggregated Ethernet (Juniper
> speak) / Etherchannels (Cisco speak).
>
> Might or might not be important when using bundled links to public
> peering fabrics.
Or for the very same go
Any one got any comments about edgedirector.com's service(s), esp wrt to
load balancing, geo-ip stuff etc.
They seem to be way way cheaper than ultradns, esp when you adding in geo-ip
load sharing and such. So is there wnay reason WHY its cheaper?
--
Martin Hepworth
Oxford, UK
You really can't compare EdgeDirector's network to UltraDNS which is
much larger and more resilient by leaps and bounds. I've spoke with
the owner of ED before and decided against using the service. Right
now we're using Afilias and the price isn't much worse, the GUI is
much nicer, and the network
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:24:24AM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
> Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> >They've definitely been improving it over the years though, so much that
> >I almost never trigger a session reset on me unintentionally any more.
>
> They must have. This was new to me and came as a sho
Sure, Rick. Maybe they can buy ours off of us!!
;-)
Regards,
Mauricio Rodriguez
Manager of IP/Data Engineering, FPL FiberNet
Email: mauricio.rodrig...@fpl.com
Office: 305-552-3418
Mobile: 786-236-2665
Pager: 786-236-2665
Apologies -- That was supposed to be addressed to Rick only...
However, the truth is that we have outgrown our FCP. YMMV with the product...
From: Rodriguez, Mauricio
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 1:08 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Bandwidth Monitoring per AS
Sure, Rick. Maybe they can bu
> However, the truth is that we have outgrown our FCP. Â YMMV with the product...
Why is that? What particular problems did you run into?
--
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications of The IRC Company, Inc.
Platinum sponsor
All,
I have a Quick Eagle DL087E here, but Quick Eagle's website has fallen
off the planet:
p...@angel:~$ host -t any www.quickeagle.com
Host www.quickeagle.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Can anyone help me out with a firmware update and/or PDF manuals? It's
been a little while since I had
Since I've opened the can of worms...
The FCP integration requires direct capturing of traffic off of your network.
This would either be a off of a port mirror or off of network taps.
We had some challenges, basically because of our architecture, implementing the
solution at first. We had a r
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:09:22PM +, Peter Hicks wrote:
> I have a Quick Eagle DL087E here, but Quick Eagle's website has
> fallen off the planet:
>
> p...@angel:~$ host -t any www.quickeagle.com
> Host www.quickeagle.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Their phones go to a reorder too.
Forwarding at the request of APNIC...
From: Secretariat
Reply-To: "secretar...@apnic.net" , Secretariat
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:31:42 -0500
To: APNIC-announce
Subject: [Apnic-announce] APNIC to make allocations from 175/8 and 182/8 soon
_
The following is a new meeting request:
Subject: APNIC to issue from 175 /8 and 182 /8 soon
Organizer: "Brian R. Watters"
Time: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 11:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM GMT -08:00
US/Canada Pacific
Invitees: "Leslie Nobile" ; "nanog"
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Forwarding at the r
The last time I drove by their office, it looked deserted - like they
had closed down.
Joe McGuckin
ViaNet Communications
j...@via.net
650-207-0372 cell
650-213-1302 office
650-969-2124 fax
On Nov 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:09:22PM +, Pete
Is anybody experiencing any issues with customer traffic originating
from either of these carriers? If anybody from SBC or AT&T can contact
me off-list I would appreciate it. Thank you.
--Stuart
Not personally, but it's being documented here:
http://www.internetpulse.net/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Kirk [mailto:sk...@godaddy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:25 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: SBC/AT&T Contact
Is anybody experiencing any issues with customer tr
I'm available, but you didn't put a bridge number in.
Best,
-M<
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, wrote:
> The following is a new meeting request:
>
> Subject: APNIC to issue from 175 /8 and 182 /8 soon
> Organizer: "Brian R. Watters"
>
> Time: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 11:00:00 AM - 12:0
I can confirm serious problems reaching at&t DSL customers. The majority seem
to be in the Pacbell regions.
Cheers,
Aaron
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:28:17PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Not personally, but it's being documented here:
> http://www.internetpulse.net/
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Me
No issues out of Dallas area for what its worth.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Aaron Hughes wrote:
> I can confirm serious problems reaching at&t DSL customers. The majority seem
> to be in the Pacbell regions.
>
> Cheers,
> Aaron
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:28:17PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrot
Stuart, ..Confirmed , packet loss , latency when connecting to several
destinations from at&t, Orange County Uverse client.
mehmet
On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:07 PM, William McCall wrote:
> No issues out of Dallas area for what its worth.
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Aaron Hughes wrote:
>>
21 matches
Mail list logo
