Re: Data Centers in England

2009-10-17 Thread Neil J. McRae
On Wed, October 7, 2009 22:33, Philip Lavine wrote: > Anyone know a good DC on England that caters to financial industry > clients? Cable and Wireless (who I work for) and COLT (who I used to work for). The only other place worth considering is Equinix but from a proximity viewpoint they are just

RE: Data Centers in England

2009-10-17 Thread Leigh Porter
Is there still the Global Crossing place on the junction of New Oxford Street and Tottenham Court Road? -- Leigh Porter -Original Message- From: Neil J. McRae [mailto:n...@domino.org] Sent: Sat 10/17/2009 11:58 AM To: Philip Lavine Cc: nanog Subject: Re: Data Centers in England On

RE: Data Centers in England

2009-10-17 Thread Leigh Porter
And frink-a-basement in Fulham is quite good. They have water cooling when the sewer floods and upto 22Mb/s when there is no water in the junction box. --- original message --- From: "Trefor Davies" Subject: RE: Data Centers in England Date: 17th October 2009 Time: 12:38:33 pm There's IOMART i

IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

2009-10-17 Thread Ray Soucy
Looking for general feedback on IPv6 deployment to the edge. As it turns out delivering IPv6 to the edge in an academic setting has been a challenge. Common wisdom says to rely on SLAAC for IPv6 addressing, and in a perfect world it would make sense. Given that historically we have relied on DHC

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

2009-10-17 Thread William Herrin
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Ray Soucy wrote: > As it turns out delivering IPv6 to the edge in an academic setting has > been a challenge.  Common wisdom says to rely on SLAAC for IPv6 > addressing, and in a perfect world it would make sense. Ray, Common wisdom says that? > Our current IPv6

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

2009-10-17 Thread Ray Soucy
> I thought someone had to respond to router solicitations for stateless > autoconfig of global scope addresses to happen. On Linux you just > don't run the radvd. On Cisco I think it's something like "ipv6 nd > suppress-ra" in the interface config. Does that fail to prevent > stateless autoconfig?

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

2009-10-17 Thread Nathan Ward
On 18/10/2009, at 2:28 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Ray Soucy wrote: As it turns out delivering IPv6 to the edge in an academic setting has been a challenge. Common wisdom says to rely on SLAAC for IPv6 addressing, and in a perfect world it would make sense.

UPDATE: NANOG 47 PGP signing party.

2009-10-17 Thread Joel Jaeggli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just a quick note, The NANOG pgp key signing party will be making an appearance at NANOG 47. The keysigning sessions are going to be held during the monday and tuesday morning break (11:00 - 11:30) in the Desoto Foyer. It is likely that we'll invi

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

2009-10-17 Thread Karl Auer
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:55 -0400, Ray Soucy wrote: > making use of SLAAC. The concern here is that older hosts with less > than OK implementations will still enable IPv6 without regard for the > stability and security concerns associated with IPv6. Some hosts - very dumb ones or very old ones, p

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

2009-10-17 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, Ray Soucy wrote: Given that historically we have relied on DHCP for a means of NAC and host registration, like many academic institutions, the idea of sweeping changes to accommodate IPv6 was just not going to happen in the near future. IETF has historically dropped the

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

2009-10-17 Thread Clue Store
>Since the goal for this initial wave is to make IPv6 available to >those who request it or have a need for it, we feel its acceptable >that there will need to be some user participation in enabling IPv6 >for a host. To me, from a small ISP perspective, this is where the largest delima is what