> -Original Message-
> From: Cord MacLeod [mailto:cordmacl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:50 PM
> To: North American Network Operators Group
> Subject: Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
>
> I'd also add that ISIS supports IPv6 through the addition of TLVs
> whereas OS
On Sep 12, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Fouant, Stefan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Cord MacLeod [mailto:cordmacl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:50 PM
To: North American Network Operators Group
Subject: Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
I'd also add that ISIS supports IPv6
> "Joe" == Joe Greco writes:
Joe> Show me ONE major MTA which allows you to configure an expiration
Joe> for an ACL entry.
Any MTA which supports using an sql db as its backend. Postfix is a
fine example.
You just define the table and the query to either have an until column,
or have a col
> > "Joe" == Joe Greco writes:
> Joe> Show me ONE major MTA which allows you to configure an expiration
> Joe> for an ACL entry.
>
> Any MTA which supports using an sql db as its backend. Postfix is a
> fine example.
>
> You just define the table and the query to either have an until column
> "Joe" == Joe Greco writes:
Joe> So, you agree, MTA's do not implement this functionality. It's
Joe> obviously possible to make it happen through shell scripting,
Joe> database tricks,
No, I do not agree.
The sql backend is part of the MTA; features added by offering a sql
backend for tab
> > "Joe" == Joe Greco writes:
>
> Joe> So, you agree, MTA's do not implement this functionality. It's
> Joe> obviously possible to make it happen through shell scripting,
> Joe> database tricks,
>
> No, I do not agree.
>
> The sql backend is part of the MTA; features added by offering a s
I have an opportunity to launch services in a remote marke, where I
cannot extend my backbone to.
However, this market is big enough that I can afford to put a Cisco
7201 over there and peer in BGP-4.
Do you have any advice as to what may happen if I advertise different
blocks from the sa
This is considered a normal and accepted practice, and there are many companies
out there that do just this sort of thing. From the perpective of everyone
else outside your AS everything will be perfectly fine. The only thing you'll
need to be aware of is that your islands will not be able to
With scarcity of IPv4 addresses, organizations are more desperate than ever
to receive an allocation. If anything, there's more of a disincentive than
ever before for ARIN to spend time on netblock sanitization.
I do think that ARIN should inform the new netblock owner if it was
previously owned
Frank Bulk wrote:
> With scarcity of IPv4 addresses, organizations are more desperate than ever
> to receive an allocation.
Factual evidence that pi allocation is in fact hard to obtain would be
required to support that statement. The fact of the matter is if you
have a legitimate application cong
> and then that's PART of the MTA. Otherwise, it's an add-on
> of some sort.
> Given that the point I was making was about capabilities *included* in
> the MTA, and given that I *said* you could add on such functions, it's
> kind of silly to try to confuse the issue in this manner.
CommuniGate P
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Francois Menard wrote:
> I have an opportunity to launch services in a remote marke, where I cannot
> extend my backbone to.
>
> However, this market is big enough that I can afford to put a Cisco 7201
> over there and peer in BGP-4.
>
> Do you have any advice as to
12 matches
Mail list logo
