Re: Telstra issues

On 03/09/09 07:47, Mark Newton wrote: We run one which isn't connected to Telstra :-) There are media reports this morning of major outages in Telstra's domestic network. http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26021106-15306,00.html Thank goodness PPC-1 is nearing completion, eh? h

nanog@nanog.org

I'm not sure where to take this issue. The Regular AT&T NOC contacts are refusing to talk to me since I do not have a circuit ID, and do not seem to have any understanding about transiting issues. I am unable to fully monitor and manage a router I control, as all traffic bound to its lan IP that

nanog@nanog.org

Work through your provider, I would start with you local end. They should help you, you ARE their customer. If not, you need a new provider. Look into out of band management. Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu Senior Network Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone CNS - Network Services

nanog@nanog.org

I have sent a complaint to the AT&T abuse contact from my ARIN contact address asking them to stop announcing the route. -- - Brian Raaen Network Engineer email: /bra...@zcorum.com/ Brian Raaen wrote: > I appreciate the offline replies. After doing som

nanog@nanog.org

I appreciate the offline replies. After doing some more research myself the issue appears to be related to the fact that AT&T is announcing the block directly. I did show "ip bgp 72.14.76.0" in a couple routers and some showed the route originating in 701 (they were able to reach it) and others s

nanog@nanog.org

Brian Raaen wrote: I appreciate the offline replies. After doing some more research myself the issue appears to be related to the fact that AT&T is announcing the block directly. I did show "ip bgp 72.14.76.0" in a couple routers and some showed the route originating in 701 (they were able to r

nanog@nanog.org

I have not seen any changes yet, although I did get an automated response from their abuse address that they received my message. Also, to answer another question I have not changed backbones in over two years. I largely suspect that this is an issue of a simple typo and not anything malicious.

nanog@nanog.org

No is just seems to die in their core network. Dorn Hetzel wrote: > If you traceroute from someplace that sees the announcement from ATT, > does it actually go anywhere beyond the core in ATT (as if they are > sending it to any customer circuit of their) ? > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Bria

Single router for P/PE functions

Hello, I'm pretty confident that a router can be used to perform P & PE functions simultaneously. What about from a best practice perspective? Is this something that should be completely avoided? Why? We're considering doing this as a temporary workaround but we all know temporary usually lasts

DENOG1 conference registrations are now open

Hi all, the German Network Operators Group (DENOG) is holding its first meeting on the 5th of November 2009 in Frankfurt, Germany. Registrations are now open at http://meeting.denog.de/registration_en.html Please note that you can benefit from our early bird rebate if you register early. A full a

Got this from Educause...

Apologies in advance, to those who, as administrators of EDU domains, may have already received this from EDUCASE... Finally, DNSSEC is going to make its way to ".edu" Are we ready? Has resistance been obliterated? Test-bed implementation.. Sept, '09 -- Original Message

NANOG47 - Program Committee will meet next week to review second round submissions

Hi folks, There are many interesting abstracts in the tool at http://pc.nanog.org and we hope to see a few more presentations arrive prior to next Wednesday. Lightning talks will not be accepted until October. That doesn't mean you can't kick out that first draft to a friend for inspiration! El

draft-iana-ipv4-examples

Folks, The IETF has recently passed draft-iana-rfc3330bis-08. This draft documents the fact that the following address ranges have been reserved for documentation: - 192.0.2.0/24 (TEST-NET-1) - 198.51.100.0/24 (TEST-NET-2) - 203.0.113.0/24 (TEST-NET-3) In addition, some authors have used 128.66.

83.222.0.0/19 Unroutable on Verizon

I can't reach 83.222.0.0/19 from Verizon, but I can via Cox Communications Business Fiber as well as Level3. Dies at a peering point it seems: HOST: homeLoss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. mph 0.0%200.7 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.1

Re: 83.222.0.0/19 Unroutable on Verizon

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > I can't reach 83.222.0.0/19 from Verizon, but I can via Cox Communications > Business Fiber as well as Level3.  Dies at a peering point it seems: > > HOST: home                        Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev >  1. mph        

Re: 83.222.0.0/19 Unroutable on Verizon

On Sep 3, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: I can't reach 83.222.0.0/19 from Verizon, but I can via Cox Communications Business Fiber as well as Level3. Dies at a peering point it seems: route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp 83.222.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 83.222.0.0/19, version

Re: 83.222.0.0/19 Unroutable on Verizon

[comment: subject is irksome - "Unroutable"? That is meaningless] On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:20:23PM -0400, Peter Beckman wrote: > I can't reach 83.222.0.0/19 from Verizon, but I can via Cox Communications > Business Fiber as well as Level3. Dies at a peering point it seems: > > HOST: home

Re: 83.222.0.0/19 Unreachable on Verizon

Subject updated to be less wrong. On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Peter Beckman wrote: I can't reach 83.222.0.0/19 from Verizon, but I can via Cox Communications Business Fiber as well as Level3. Dies at a peering point it seems: HOST: homeLoss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDe

Power basics- any resources?

I need to teach an operations group (Systems, Network, Security, IT folks) some basics of power as it applies to the team. Normal things they will see and should understand when they are planning on bringing equipment online etc. I have an idea of many things to talk about, particularly as they ap

Re: Request for a pointer - Linux modifying DSCP on replies?

I wanted to go ahead and reply back with what I figured out. The easiest way to solve this problem turned out to be to utilize netfilters CONNMARK module, which sadly is not available in some older but still used linux kernels. Syntax for this is as follows: # Set outgoing DSCP on connections to s

Re: Power basics- any resources?

When it's ok to use a C14 to NEMA 5-15R cable and when it's really NOT ok.. On Sep 3, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Darren Bolding wrote: I need to teach an operations group (Systems, Network, Security, IT folks) some basics of power as it applies to the team. Normal things they will see and shoul

Re: Power basics- any resources?

APC (http://www.apc.com) has lots of info Data Center related (...support...), where you could find some good stuff. HTH On 9/3/09, Darren Bolding wrote: > I need to teach an operations group (Systems, Network, Security, IT folks) > some basics of power as it applies to the team. Normal things

Re: Power basics- any resources?

Remind them that power does not come from "the wall", there are many things they have to keep an eye on, and know where they are and what not to touch and who can touch and when. ie Transformers, transfer switches, dc power plants if you have them, etc, etc. My .02

Re: Single router for P/PE functions

> Not only can they, it's done quite frequently. I just completed a >> deployment of seven Juniper MX series routers in a dual ring configuration, >> all acting as combination P/PE devices for a state government WAN backbone. >> Works like a charm. >> >> Erik >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:20 A

Re: Single router for P/PE functions

Kinda depends on what you're doing exactly, but like Erik said, it certainly possible and depending on your particular needs, it might not be much of an issue at all. Can you describe your scenario a bit more? --WM On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Serge Vautour wrote: > Hello, > > I'm pretty co

Re: Single router for P/PE functions

On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Serge Vautour wrote: I'm pretty confident that a router can be used to perform P & PE functions simultaneously. What about from a best practice perspective? Is this something that should be completely avoided? Why? We're considering doing this as a temporary workaround but

Re: picking up server vendor in a global scope..

Thank you for all your responses.. I thought i would drop a short recap note for those who will be reading this in the future while searching the same information. I have been recommended by various people who have personally dealt the relations with server vendors around the world and many h