> If your 95th percentile utilization is at 80% capacity, it's time to
> start planning the upgrade.
s/80/60/
the normal snmp and other averaging methods *really* miss the bursts.
randy
On 30/08/2009 13:04, Randy Bush wrote:
the normal snmp and other averaging methods *really* miss the bursts.
Definitely. For fun and giggles, I recently turned on 30 second polling on
some kit and it turned up all sorts of interesting peculiarities that were
completely blotted out in a 5 min
Nick Hilliard wrote:
Definitely. For fun and giggles, I recently turned on 30 second polling
on some kit and it turned up all sorts of interesting peculiarities that
were completely blotted out in a 5 minute average.
Would RMON History and Alarms help? I've always considered rolling them
o
If talking about just max capacity, I would agree with most of the
statements of 80+% being in the right range, likely with a very fine
line of when you actually start seeing a performance impact.
Operationally, at least in our network, I'd never run anything at that
level. Providers that are
> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:04:15 +0900
> From: Randy Bush
>
> > If your 95th percentile utilization is at 80% capacity, it's time to
> > start planning the upgrade.
>
> s/80/60/
>
> the normal snmp and other averaging methods *really* miss the bursts.
s/60/40/
If you need to carry large TCP
What system were you using to monitor link usage?
Shane
On Aug 30, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 30/08/2009 13:04, Randy Bush wrote:
the normal snmp and other averaging methods *really* miss the bursts.
Definitely. For fun and giggles, I recently turned on 30 second
polling on
On 30/08/2009 17:53, Shane Ronan wrote:
What system were you using to monitor link usage?
yrtg
Nick
On Aug 30, 2009, at 1:23 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, William Herrin wrote:
If your 95th percentile utilization is at 80% capacity, it's time
to start planning the upgrade. If your 95th percentile utilization
is at 95% it's time to finish the upgrade.
I now see why pe
If your 95th percentile utilization is at 80% capacity...
s/80/60/
s/60/40/
I would suggest that the reason each of you have a different number is
because there's a different best number for each case. Looking for any
single number to fit all cases, rather than understanding the underlying
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 01:03:35PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >Also, a gig link on a Cisco will do approx 93-94% of imix of a gig
> >in the values presented via SNMP (around 930-940 megabit/s as seen
> >in "show int") before it's full, because of IFG, ethernet header
> >overhead etc.
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Jeff Young wrote:
The more troubling parts of this bill had to do with the President,
at his discretion, classifying parts of public networks as "critical
infrastructure" and so on.
Whatever your opinion, get involved. Let your representatives know about
your better ideas
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Jeff Young wrote:
> > The more troubling parts of this bill had to do with the President,
> > at his discretion, classifying parts of public networks as "critical
> > infrastructure" and so on.
>
> Whatever your
> I strongly second this. To quote a bumper sticker/slogan I've seen,
> "if you didn't vote, you shouldn't complain". Some prominent
> politicians have proposed something that we -- including me -- believe
> to be a bad idea, not just on ideological grounds but because we think
> that it won't ac
+1
I operate a Maine ISP/ASP, and Senator Snowe is my lobbying target.
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
Sean Donelan wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Jeff Young wrote:
The more troubling parts of this bill had to do with the President,
at his discretion
randy,
moveon is a maine-based org. it is an effective, fund raising, partisan
organization. it is much more than a click-and-opine vehicle, it puts
hundreds of thousands of dollars into competitive races, and has a
competent political director.
to create a "NagOn" we would have to hire or a
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:20:55 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> randy,
>
> moveon is a maine-based org. it is an effective, fund raising,
> partisan organization. it is much more than a click-and-opine
> vehicle, it puts hundreds of thousands of dollars into competitive
> races, and has a comp
> > > If your 95th percentile utilization is at 80% capacity,
> it's time to
> > > start planning the upgrade.
> >
> > s/80/60/
> >
> > the normal snmp and other averaging methods *really* miss
> the bursts.
>
> s/60/40/
>
What is this "upgrade" thing you all speak of? When your links become
On 8/28/2009 6:11 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hiers, David wrote:
Governments already license stock brokers, pilots, commercial drivers,
accountants, engineers, all sorts of people whose mistakes can be
measured in the loss of hundreds of lives and millions of dollars.
"'Th
18 matches
Mail list logo
