On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:38:38AM -0400, Dan Snyder wrote:
> We have done power tests before and had no problem. I guess I am looking
> for someone who does testing of the network equipment outside of just power
> tests. We had an outage due to a configuration mistake that became apparent
> when
I need a SORBS maintainer to contact me.
The SORBS site reports the site and databases are in maintenance mode for
the second day in a row. One of my domains was legitimately listed, but
now that I've resolved the problem, I'm unable to request removal.
Regards,
Tim R. Rainier
Systems Admini
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 train...@kalsec.com wrote:
I need a SORBS maintainer to contact me.
The SORBS site reports the site and databases are in maintenance mode for
the second day in a row. One of my domains was legitimately listed, but
now that I've resolved the problem, I'm unable to request re
On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:40 AM, train...@kalsec.com wrote:
I need a SORBS maintainer to contact me.
I don't think they watch here; at least I've never seen Michelle post
here. Try dnsbl-users, the SORBS mailling list. From the google cache
of the Mailling Lists page --
"This list is an ope
Thanks for the replies. I will use the mailing list if my issue doesn't
get resolved.
Regards,
Tim R. Rainier
Systems Administrator II
Kalsec Inc.
www.kalsec.com
Marc Powell wrote on 08/25/2009 10:35:43 AM:
> From:
>
> Marc Powell
>
> To:
>
> NANOG list
>
> Date:
>
> 08/25/2009 10:36
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 09:35 -0500, Marc Powell wrote:
> I don't think they watch here; at least I've never seen Michelle post
> here.
I've had confirmation from Michelle personally this morning (following a
similar question elsewhere) that the SORBS systems are indeed
relocating. From a previous
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 24/08/2009 19:03, Holmes,David A wrote:
>
>> Additionally, and perhaps most significantly for deterministic network
>> design, the copper cards share input hardware buffers for every 8 ports.
>> Running one port of the 8 at wire speed wil
It's not a technical question, it's a political one, so feel free to
squelch this for off-topicness if you want.
Technically, broadband is "faster than narrowband", and beyond that
it's "fast enough for what you're trying to sell"; tell me what you're
trying to sell and I'll tell you how fast a con
On Aug 24, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Luke Marrott wrote:
What are your thoughts on what the definition of Broadband should be
going
forward? I would assume this will be the standard definition for a
number of
years to come.
Historically, narrowband was circuit switched (ISDN etc) and broadband
There's more to data integrity in a data center (well, anything powered,
that is) than network configurations. There's the loading of individual
power outlets, UPS loading, UPS battery replacement cycles, loading of
circuits, backup lighting, etc. And the only way to know if something is
really w
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Jeff Aitken wrote:
>[..] Periodically inducing failures to catch [...] them is sorta like using
>your smoke detector as an oven timer.
>[..]
> machine-parsable format, but the benefit is that you know in pseudo-realtime
> when something is wrong, as opposed to find
Most Provider type datacenters I've worked with get a lot of flak from
customers when they announce they're doing network failover testing, because
there's always going to be a certain amount of chance (at least) of
disruption. Its the exception to find a provider that does it I think (or
maybe jus
12 matches
Mail list logo
