Re: BGP Growth projections

Mark Radabaugh wrote: I'm looking for new core routers for a small ISP and having a hard time finding something appropriate and reasonably priced. We don't have huge traffic levels (<1Gb) and are mostly running Ethernet interfaces to upstreams rather than legacy interfaces (when did OC3 beco

Re: BGP Growth projections

I would second Ivan's comment. Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the "small ISP" requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a limited view with a default route. Arie On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote: > Let me be the devil's advocate:

cogent contact

Could someone from cogent please contact me offlist? status.cogentco.com shows no problems but we're seeing prolonged and high packet losses from multiple locations.

Re: cogent contact

Jamon Camisso wrote: Could someone from cogent please contact me offlist? status.cogentco.com shows no problems but we're seeing prolonged and high packet losses from multiple locations. We are also experiencing similar issues. Our site had scheduled maintenance last night and we were notif

Re: BGP Growth projections

On 10 jul 2009, at 19:03, Joel Jaeggli wrote: IPv6 is going to explode the routing table in the next 5 years. More like, ipv4 is going explode the routing table in the next 5 years? IPv6 is now at something like 1.2 - 1.4 prefixes per AS. So it will take a LONG time before we reach 100k

Re: cogent contact

Hi, We have same issues in Dallas. - Konstantin

RE: cogent contact

So are we in the DFW area. Ric. Softlayer. www.softlayer.com Jamon Camisso wrote: > Could someone from cogent please contact me offlist? > status.cogentco.com shows no problems but we're seeing prolonged and > high packet losses from multiple locations. > We are also experiencing similar i

Re: Can someone from SORBS contact me offlist?

On Jul 11, 4:58 pm, "Patrick W. Gilmore" wrote: > On Jul 11, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote: > P.S. Anyone looking to find a good DNSBL, I would recommend Al > Iverson's web page, . Hrmmm, AHBL is not > listed there. Al's pretty clueful about such things and checks

Re: cogent contact

Dan White wrote: Jamon Camisso wrote: Could someone from cogent please contact me offlist? status.cogentco.com shows no problems but we're seeing prolonged and high packet losses from multiple locations. We are also experiencing similar issues. Our site had scheduled maintenance last night

Re: Point to Point Ethernet

> Prices of terrestrial SDH/SONET cards are very low for transport providers. > For customers I believe there is a greater divergenc between the Ethernet and > SONET/SDH costs. > > A strong hunch based on what clients tell me Cisco charges for SONET/SDH > interfaces. I doubt a lot of people

RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Re: Point to Point Ethernet - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses

> Prices of terrestrial SDH/SONET cards are very low for transport providers. > For customers I believe there is a greater divergenc between the Ethernet and > SONET/SDH costs. > > A strong hunch based on what clients tell me Cisco charges for SONET/SDH > interfaces. I doubt a lot of people

Re: BGP Growth projections

On 2009-07-12-06:09:12, Arie Vayner wrote: > Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the "small ISP" > requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a > limited view with a default route. Disagree. Protection against big-provider depeerings, interdomain capacity pro

RE: Can someone from SORBS contact me offlist?

>People bitch and whine about free services more than when they actually >pay for something. Sad. That's the nature of people who want something for nothing. When you charge, even a little bit, you select the bottom part of the gene pool out of your client base.

RE: BGP Growth projections

> On 2009-07-12-06:09:12, Arie Vayner wrote: > > Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the "small ISP" > > requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a > > limited view with a default route. > > Disagree. Protection against big-provider depeerings, > interd

RE: BGP Growth projections

Give Vyatta on a decent x86 server a try. http://www.vyatta.com/downloads/appbrief/Vyatta_app_BGP.pdf -Original Message- From: Mark Radabaugh [mailto:m...@amplex.net] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 9:42 AM To: nanog list Subject: BGP Growth projections I'm looking for new core routers for

DDOS Followup

I had a pleasant chat with tier 2 support and they changed my IP range. All is now well. Thanks to all who replied.

Re: BGP Growth projections

On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Arie Vayner wrote: I would second Ivan's comment. Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the "small ISP" requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a limited view with a default route. Until something breaks or the next big depeering chick

Re: BGP Growth projections

Ivan Pepelnjak wrote: Let me be the devil's advocate: why would you need full Internet routing? Taking reasonably sized neighborhoods of your upstreams (AS paths up to X AS numbers) plus a default to your best upstream might do the trick. Ivan We currently do exactly that - dropping anythin