Scott Howard wrote:
We're looking at getting connectivity via Level 3 in a particular
datacenter, but we're being told that it's "legacy Wiltel/Looking Glass"
rather than "true" Level 3.
Given that both of these acquisitions occurred years ago should I be
worried, or is this "legacy" connectivit
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Justin Shore wrote:
Every time we tried to take this position we got the same old line of
"we've got everything in the path configured correctly; you'll get the
full 200Mbps" to which I'd reply with a reminder that we got the same
assurance when we turned up the 100Mbps with
CDW just opened a new DC outside madison or milwaukee. Operated by
burbee who they bought a few years ago.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jeff Rooney wrote:
> Does anyone know of any decent data centers in Wisconsin, preferably
> Madison or Milwaukee, that offer private caged environments or suites?
There are a few colo facilities of note in the Madison area (Berbee,
owned by "CDW", SupraNet, and TDS
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Dylan Ebner wrote:
> CDW just opened a new DC outside madison or milwaukee. Operated by
> burbee who they bought a few years ago.
Indeed, I didn't focus on it in my previous note, but
http://www.team-companies.com/, CDW/Berbee, and a few other interests
pooled res
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Dan White wrote:
> Are there any high level operational details you could share?
>
> Specifically, are you using any commercial/OSS software to handle the
> (automated?) periodic key roll overs?
We looked at Secure64's product but decided to follow the o
On Jul 6, 2009, at 11:08 AM, ne...@enginehosting.com wrote:
On Monday, July 6, 2009 10:00am, "Michael Holstein" > said:
However it doesn't scale
Anyone who's seen the "fail whale" might argue the same about
Twitter.
Cheers,
Michael Holstein
Cleveland State University
With a past week
However it doesn't scale
Anyone who's seen the "fail whale" might argue the same about
Twitter.
Just to add something to this, twitter has been slow all afternoon
and now I am getting the "fail whale"
I just thought I would point out in real time the obvious danger of
using a backup
On Jul 7, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Marc Manthey wrote:
However it doesn't scale
Anyone who's seen the "fail whale" might argue the same about
Twitter.
Just to add something to this, twitter has been slow all afternoon
and now I am getting the "fail whale"
I just thought I would point out
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
In a real crisis, redundancy rules.
... and simplicity.
It's always "fun" when those outages pages rely on sql backends etc, so
they're capable of tens or hundreds of users, so they look fine normally.
When an outage happens and people really need
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
>> In a real crisis, redundancy rules.
>
> ... and simplicity.
>
> It's always "fun" when those outages pages rely on sql backends etc, so
> they're capable of tens or hundreds of users, so the
On Jul 7, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
In a real crisis, redundancy rules.
... and simplicity.
It's always "fun" when those outages pages rely on sql backends etc,
so they're capable of tens or hundreds of users, so they look fin
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
http://www.coralcdn.org/
Nice, looks very much like the thing I was advocating. Hard part is
getting authorities et al interested in such an "ad hoc" solution.
Preferrably they could do both and then we can see which one works best in
an emergenc
In message <20090707171251.ga2...@arin.net>, Mark Kosters writes:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Dan White wrote:
> > Are there any high level operational details you could share?
> >
> > Specifically, are you using any commercial/OSS software to handle the
> > (automated?) periodic
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:09:49AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <20090707171251.ga2...@arin.net>, Mark Kosters writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Dan White wrote:
> > > Are there any high level operational details you could share?
> > >
> > > Specifically, are you
In message <20090708013805.ga1...@vacation.karoshi.com.>, bmann...@vacation.kar
oshi.com writes:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:09:49AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > In message <20090707171251.ga2...@arin.net>, Mark Kosters writes:
> > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Dan White wrot
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:58:17AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > > > received a lot of good feedback with the conclusion that using a
> > > > restful
> > > > service would be a useful transport for this type of data transfer.
> > > > We certainly need your feedback on future services and enc
In message <20090708025854.ga1...@vacation.karoshi.com.>, bmann...@vacation.kar
oshi.com writes:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:58:17AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > > > > received a lot of good feedback with the conclusion that using a rest
> ful
> > > > > service would be a useful transport
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:58:17AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >
> > hey, thats what the CADR tool does. fully in-band maintainace
> > for the child/parent interactions. only needs manual re-keying
> > if a party loses control of the credential.
> > -- bill
>
> It woul
19 matches
Mail list logo
