Ninjas,
I'm compiling some data re this year's "Earth Hour"[1] .
For those not in the know, or those that dismissed it, "Earth Hour" is
something the World Wildlife Fund cooked up, suggesting that the world "turn
off" all non-essential electrical devices, to demonstrate some
global-warming h
jamie rishaw wrote:
> Ninjas,
>
> I'm compiling some data re this year's "Earth Hour"[1] .
>
> For those not in the know, or those that dismissed it, "Earth Hour" is
> something the World Wildlife Fund cooked up, suggesting that the world "turn
> off" all non-essential electrical devices, to
Hi There,
Since we use a vendor of "the vendor" of two Irish sea submarine
cables I am wondering if anyone has first hand information on the
fiber cut this morning? Does anyone have a status update on what is
happening? I am getting some Chinese whispers going on here.
Thanks!
Ken
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 05:13:54PM +, tt tt wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> We are looking to move our non infrastructure routes into iBGP
> to help with our IGP scalability (OSPF). We already run full BGP
> tables on our core where we connect to multiple upstream and
> downstream customers. Most o
affecting whom? and who's network?
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, Ken Gilmour wrote:
> From: Ken Gilmour
> Subject: Fiber cut on Irish Sea
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 4:55 PM
> Hi There,
>
> Since we use a vendor of "the vendor" of two
> Irish sea submarine
> cables I am wond
We received the report from Packet Exchange, however they are not the
owners of the cable. I assume they just rent spectrum.
2009/3/29 isabel dias :
>
> affecting whom? and who's network?
>
>
> --- On Sun, 3/29/09, Ken Gilmour wrote:
>
>> From: Ken Gilmour
>> Subject: Fiber cut on Irish Sea
>> T
Are you able to provide historical information on the incident/outgae you have
experienced?
Are you able to provide an egress and/or igress traffic coming in and out of
your network to make sure your traffic was crossing that transmission path?
I guess you must have visibility of planned work
Hi,
This has been fixed now. I will follow up directly with PE for an RFO.
Thanks for your help on and off list.
Regards,
Ken
2009/3/29 isabel dias :
>
> Are you able to provide historical information on the incident/outgae you
> have experienced?
>
> Are you able to provide an egress and/or
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Ken Gilmour wrote:
This has been fixed now. I will follow up directly with PE for an RFO.
If it was repaired that quickly it was probably not a cut or a 'wet'
failure but maybe something like an electronics failure in a landing
station or something similar.
jms
2009/3/29 Justin M. Streiner :
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Ken Gilmour wrote:
>
>> This has been fixed now. I will follow up directly with PE for an RFO.
>
> If it was repaired that quickly it was probably not a cut or a 'wet' failure
> but maybe something like an electronics failure in a landing statio
>PE also reported that the problem started at 8:00 AM on the
>29th and was repaired at 9:05 (no AM or PM) on the 26th (yes,
>three days in the past)
Hey!?!?!? Where'd they get a time machine! lol, j/k You mean 26th at 8am
to the 29th 9:05 M-less?
regards
> -Original Message-
> From:
2009/3/29 Joe Blanchard :
> Hey!?!?!? Where'd they get a time machine! lol, j/k You mean 26th at 8am
> to the 29th 9:05 M-less?
I just received the corrected time: 02:58 BST to 09:03 BST.
Regards,
Ken
I hope that today's cnn.com article cited below meets the criteria of
sufficient
"Internet operational and technical issues" pursuant to NANOG AUP criteria
#1
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/technology/29spy.html?_r=2&hp
Tony Patti
CIO
S. Walter Packaging Corp.
t...@swalter.com
March 29, 2009
ken, who's fiber on the ground was it after all?
Roderick Beck wrote:
> Probably Global Crossing.
>
> A very strong wager.
>
> -R.
> --Original Message--
> From: Ken Gilmour
> To: isabeldi...@yahoo.com
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Fiber cut on Irish Sea
> Sent: 29 Mar 2009 16:0
Hi Isabel,
It hasn't been confirmed to me yet but some people have mentioned that
it is most likely to belong to Global Crossing.
Regards,
Ken
2009/3/29 isabel dias :
>
> ken, who's fiber on the ground was it after all?
>
> Roderick Beck wrote:
>> Probably Global Crossing.
>>
>> A very strong w
Anyone have a copy of this? Would like to analyze it and understand its
propagation.
Thanks
-Joe
Visit the authority: http://www.confickerworkinggroup.org/wiki/
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Blanchard [mailto:jbfixu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 4:43 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: The Confiker Virus.
>
>
> Anyone have a copy of this? Would like to analyze i
SRI has a detailed analysis of conflicker at http://mtc.sri.com/Conficker/
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139
-Original Message-
From: Joe Blanchard [mail
Thanks, the only thing is that these, like most, websites are very vague
about the mechanics behind the infiltration. Thus the reason why I asked
about finding some source code/example code.
Its pretty nice that these folks (symantics/trend) offer free help
regarding these items, but the facts (T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Matthew Huff wrote:
> SRI has a detailed analysis of conflicker at
> http://mtc.sri.com/Conficker/
>
The most relevant section the Conficker.C addendum -- this has been driving
the April 1st hype.
http://mtc.sri.com
Joe said earlier today:
> Thanks, the only thing is that these, like most, websites are very vague
about the mechanics behind the infiltration
Joe, the SRI report would be right up your alley as it is the most
technical in its analysis of the variants A and B as well as an
Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps
old news.
Should I just redirect or is our DNS corrupt?
Darn it
Thanks in advance
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:43:47 -0400
"Joe Blanchard" wrote:
>
>
> Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+
> complaints.
>
> going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know,
> perhaps old news.
>
> Should I just redirect or is our DNS corrupt?
>
Should yo
Opps my bad sorry for the static. gov/org I should have seen that.
Sorry again.
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Joe Blanchard wrote:
Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps
old news.
Should I just redirect or is our DNS corrupt?
There's something wrong with this reality. Ma
Joe Blanchard wrote:
Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps
old news.
whitehouse.gov does not equal whitehouse.org .
And some of us who have been around for a while can attest with
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Jay Hennigan wrote:
And some of us who have been around for a while can attest with some
certainty that whitehouse.gov DEFINITELY doesn't equal whitehouse.com . :-)
Oh I don't know...what about during the Clinton years?
---
whitehouse.org has had the same A record for quite some time, sharing the ip
with a bunch of other .. interesting .. sites.
It's been at 67.19.217.250 for years now. If your info matches that,
there's no DNS issues to worry about.
-j
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Joe Blanchard wrote:
>
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
