On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:21 AM, JC Dill wrote:
| jamie rishaw wrote:
| |
| | Akamai customer support is cc...@.
|
| No one said that noc@ was "not the place" - someone (who works at Akamai)
| said that the RFC specified noc@ works, and it does.
it was a redirect, and he was pretty rude
| To sum
>> And yes indeed, its a way for us to automate termination of spammers,
>> and to discover other patterns (in signup methods / spam content etc)
>> that we can use to update our filters.
>
>That's a great theory. Would you be willing to post an update to this
>list if and when your technology a
I thought that this was discussed not too long ago... Since these are
standardized emails you can easily automate this to generate reports for your
employees to look through. This way you can see patterns and take action. For
instance if you get a single complaint against a customer then it like
In this email message I'd like to discuss two subjects:
a. Phishing against ISPs.
b. Phishing in different languages against ISPs as soon as Google adds a
new translation module.
[My apologies to those who receive this email more than once. I am
approaching several different industries on this ma
On 25 Mar 2009 11:52:20 -
John Levine wrote:
> >> And yes indeed, its a way for us to automate termination of
> >> spammers, and to discover other patterns (in signup methods / spam
> >> content etc) that we can use to update our filters.
> >
> >That's a great theory. Would you be willing
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> In this email message I'd like to discuss two subjects:
That makes one of us,
> b. Phishing in different languages against ISPs as soon as Google adds a
> new translation module.
>
> In the past few weeks there has been an increasing number
Paul Wall wrote:
That makes one of us,
Paul, please refrain from silly attacks, as your message didn't provide
anything substantive for this list. And your attempts at derisive humor
weren't amusing. Grow up.
===
I've not recently seen an ISP account phish here. The last one I remember
was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Mobile IP and Mobile IPv6
Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090325-mobileip
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090325-mobileip.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 March 25 1600
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS cTCP Denial of Service
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090325-ctcp
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090325-ctcp.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 March 25 1600 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software WebVPN and SSLVPN
Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090325-webvpn
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090325-webvpn.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 March 25 1600 UTC (GMT
William Allen Simpson wrote:
I've not recently seen an ISP account phish here. The last one I remember
was circa 2003. It was a dictionary attack, arriving at my was@ account
(long since rendered useless by spam volume and terminated).
However, I don't save phish/spam anymore. I used to save
Hello nanog mailing list,
I was curious how one would go about looking for certain types of remote
hands by geography (ie coaxial runs in Phoenix, AZ). Is there another
mailing list or a web site that recommends itself?
--
Owen Roth
Network Engineer
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:55:40 CDT, Paul Wall said:
> Since at the time Google added Hebrew translations, they also added
>7. Latvian,
If I see actually *see* one, I'll let you know. Would be a welcome change
from all the scams I continually get in languages I *can't* read.
pgpxjDZX8C7jC.pg
Jeffrey Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:21 AM, JC Dill wrote:
| Customers also have/know
| about ccare@ which also works. Non-customers (surprise - not everyone is
an
| Akamai customer, and non-customers do have valid reasons to contact a NOC
| now and then) who don't know about the sup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:02 AM, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
>
> I've not recently seen an ISP account phish here. The last one I
> remember was circa 2003. It was a dictionary attack, arriving at my was@
> account (long since rendered useless by
We have a need for a DS-3 extension (734 duplex co-ax, 300 foot run, BNC
termination) in Scottsdale, AZ. A recommendation for a clueful wiring
contractor familiar with this type of work would be greatly appreciated!
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net
Impulse I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Owen Roth wrote:
> Hello nanog mailing list,
>
> I was curious how one would go about looking for certain types of remote
> hands by geography (ie coaxial runs in Phoenix, AZ). Is there another
> mailing list or a web site that recommends itself?
>
-
Resent from my subscribed address. Hopefully this isn't a dupe to anybody.
---
I'm working on turning up our first GigE connection (400mbs CIR) and the
various online speedtests I'm aware of choke after about 100Mbs or so.
Does anybody know of testing sites t
Gadi Evron wrote:
The guy mentioned the concept of sending warning emails to customers to
begin with. His opinion is that it is a mistake, and only causes
confusion. On top of that it raises support desk costs as people call in
for explanation, as well as to report new fraudulent emails they s
In cases where lengthy in-house DS3 demarc extensions must be run, we
have found it expedient to have the local telco provider (Qwest in
Scottsdale?) extend the demarc. That way the telco is responsible for
end-to-end CSU-to-CSU wiring diagnosis and repair.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Hen
You can try:
http://www.measurementlab.net/measurement-lab-tools#ndt
-Azher
Rick Ernst wrote:
> Resent from my subscribed address. Hopefully this isn't a dupe to anybody.
> ---
>
>
> I'm working on turning up our first GigE connection (400mbs CIR) and the
>
Azher,
Thanks for the link. I don't currently have a Linux box I can stick on
the network, but I'm trying to get one built.
I'm also working with somebody in Seattle for file transfer testing.
Thanks,
Rick
On Wed, March 25, 2009 12:10, Azher Mughal wrote:
> You can try:
>
> http://www.measur
I think windows should be fine, i just tested it from Vista and FireFox.
-Azher
Rick Ernst wrote:
> Azher,
>
> Thanks for the link. I don't currently have a Linux box I can stick on
> the network, but I'm trying to get one built.
>
> I'm also working with somebody in Seattle for file transfer
Rick. The speedtests are only as good as the hosts they're hosted on and the
path by which you reach them.
I use iperf on each end of a link that I'm turning up. I put Linux hosts at
both endpoints, but I believe iperf comes in a windows flavor too.
-b
F
Yup. I use iperf for point-to-point testing, but this is an access
connection which is why I'm looking more for some kind of test host on
Level3 in Seattle rather than a "speed test" site per se.
Rick
On Wed, March 25, 2009 12:35, Bill Blackford wrote:
> Rick. The speedtests are only as good
Hi Rick,
Try an anon ftp or http download from http://ftp.heanet.ie The cluster that
serves for ftp.heanet.ie has multiple machines with at least single or bonded
10GE interfaces into HEAnet's backbone and then minimum of 10GE on two carriers
to the general internet.
Should give you a pretty g
> Azher,
>
> Thanks for the link. I don't currently have a Linux box I can stick on
> the network, but I'm trying to get one built.
All you need on the client side is a browser with Java support (and in
your case, a gigabit NIC). Ahzer mentioned using Vista/Firefox in his
reply, I've used both M
> > Azher,
> >
> > Thanks for the link. I don't currently have a Linux box I can stick on
> > the network, but I'm trying to get one built.
>
> All you need on the client side is a browser with Java support (and in
> your case, a gigabit NIC). Ahzer mentioned using Vista/Firefox in his
> reply,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:05:25AM -0700, Rick Ernst wrote:
> I'm working on turning up our first GigE connection (400mbs CIR) and the
> various online speedtests I'm aware of choke after about 100Mbs or so.
>
> Does anybody know of testing sites that can handle higher bandwidth, or
> have an
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:58 PM, virendra rode wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Owen Roth wrote:
>> Hello nanog mailing list,
>>
>> I was curious how one would go about looking for certain types of remote
>> hands by geography (ie coaxial runs in Phoenix, AZ). Is there
Don't be afraid to create zones for each
location, DNS lends itself to this kind of
hierarchy naturally.
I find this is tidier than lengthy A records.
I.e, hostname.location.domain
This also makes your zones a little more
manageable (although on all accounts, some
simple automation will ensure
On Mar 25, 2009, at 7:07 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:58 PM, virendra rode > wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Owen Roth wrote:
Hello nanog mailing list,
I was curious how one would go about looking for certain types of
remote
hands by geograph
The ARIN Board has put forth an emergency policy change:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2009_1.html
As this is an emergency change the timeframe for comments is greatly
compressed, the current comment period ends April 7th.
If the operators have input on this action you need to get over
I turned-up a pair of 10GigE circuits a while back (with a different,
unnamed carrier).
They didn't perform too well. When I pushed them for assistance with
testing, they revealed that they had multiple IPERF transponders
scattered throughout their network.
They were not open to the public, b
If you're turning up a 10 GigE circuit, as a customer I would be asking for
that circuit to be tested with some modern tools such as the JDSU T-BERD.
For the price you're probably paying, it's probably not unreasonable to have
it as part of the turn-up fee.
Frank
-Original Message-
From:
The attachment circuits physical media was single mode dark fiber
mid-span meet. After some tinkering with colo center jumpers, the
physical attachment circuits were rock solid. The issue was the
internal IP network of the ISP (or lack of same).
You get what you pay for. (At most. Quite o
Not sure if anyone has followed the recent announcement of OnLive and
their new gaming service which will basically allow them to stream
video game gameplay output realtime to any commodity PC over a
broadband network.
Currnet ISP pricing models are not not how many backbone providers
today can ha
on Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:26:59AM +1030, Tom Wright wrote:
> Don't be afraid to create zones for each
> location, DNS lends itself to this kind of
> hierarchy naturally.
>
> I find this is tidier than lengthy A records.
>
> I.e, hostname.location.domain
And yet makes it more difficult for anyone
38 matches
Mail list logo
