As I gather, there is a mix of answers, ranging from "building the resources
according to requirements and HOPE for the best" to "use of arguably
sophisticated tools and perhaps sharing the results with the legal
department".
I would be particularly interested in hearing the service providers'
vie
Hi Guys,
If anyone can tell me how to resolve this issue there's a strong possibility
of a fedex'd beer.
Using Putty or any other ssh/telnet terminal I find that Ctrl+Shift+6 then X
(on a cisco) works only sometimes after beating your keyboard multiple times
with a hammer, has anyone else
Re Bruce,
br...@yoafrica.com (Bruce Grobler) wrote:
> Using Putty or any other ssh/telnet terminal I find that Ctrl+Shift+6 then X
> (on a cisco) works only sometimes after beating your keyboard multiple times
> with a hammer, has anyone else come across or had a solution to this problem
> ?
I
Bruce,
I have that problem using any terminal program (I use SecureCRT).. I have to
bang the command like 10-20 times for the device to recognize it. Kind of wished
CTRL-C or something worked better and actually worked well.
Shon Elliott
Senior Network Engineer
unWired Broadband, Inc.
Bruce G
Ye, exact same things happens for me, then after it decides to execute it
you have a nice long line of 6x6x66x6x666x6, tried the Ctrl+6 no such
luck...
-Original Message-
From: Shon Elliott [mailto:s...@unwiredbb.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:48 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org >> nan
Hi,
Yep does that all the time the worst is on a traceroute where it seems you need
to wait for the end of line to send the ctrl+shift+6.
Workaround on cisco:
Line con 0
Escape-character 3
Line vty 0 4
Escape-character 3
Whith this you can just CTRL+C
Cheers,
Michel Moriniaux
-Message d'
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Shon Elliott wrote:
> I have that problem using any terminal program (I use SecureCRT).. I have to
> bang the command like 10-20 times for the device to recognize it. Kind of
> wished
> CTRL-C or something worked better and actually worked well.
I usually change
Just configure a different escape character with "terminal escape x". For
example, "term esc 3" will make Ctrl/C the escape character (and Ctrl/C+X
the escape sequence). Ctrl/^ is "somewhat" hard to get on "some" terminal
emulators :)
Ivan
> > If anyone can tell me how to resolve this issue there
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Danny McPherson wrote:
On Feb 22, 2009, at 10:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Paul Wall wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
What was that story with an African routes some years back, any memories
anyone? I am lo
Oh wow, that worked like a charm Thanks a bunch!!! :D
-Original Message-
From: Moriniaux Michel [mailto:mmorini...@prosodie.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:18 AM
To: Bruce Grobler; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X
Hi,
Yep does that all the time the worst is o
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:28:17 +0200
"Bruce Grobler" wrote:
> Oh wow, that worked like a charm Thanks a bunch!!! :D
>
What, nobody's using vt220s anymore?
(Almost bought one (or rather a vt420) off ebay for fun to plug in to
one of our 2500 terminal servers for the machine room - but realis
Hi
Can you share your experience what is fastest Gig switch?
I see there is CEF feature in cisco.
ls it big different when i enable it in switch vs other switch?
ls there any problem?
Thank you
Can you elaborate a bit on your question? The fastest "Gig switches"
can do 1GB full speed on the port. There are many that can do that.
Do you have a particular density you need to do full speed with? Any
particular features? Are you looking at any particular models now, in
others words
In a "Former Life" we used Comcast for transport for a school corporation.
In the 3 years we used them we have 10 minutes of unscheduled downtime.
Justin
All of the protocols below should be turned off; my understanding is
that with dot1q trunking vlan1 cannot be removed from the trunk,
although Cisco's isl trunking allows the removal of all vlans. If Cisco
equipment is used, the "bpdu filter" command is useful as it instructs
the switch to neither
http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=1&pageid=28&pagename=Sci-Tech
--
mailto:n...@layer3arts.com //
GoogleTalk: nrauhau...@gmail.com
IM: nealrauhauser
Very nice. But note that our group's name is "North American Network
Operators' Group" (not "Operations").
--
Tony Rall
Whoops - will have to go dig and see if that's my error or the editors.
They've wound it up a bit over my reporting ... the audience there is
educated but non-technical.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Tony Rall wrote:
> Very nice. But note that our group's name is "North American Network
In a level2 only ISIS network (not using multiple areas due to MPLS
limitations), is there a better method for handling aggregate routes
than creating an aggregate and redistributing it into ISIS for each
router? Primarily Cisco/Juniper based. Cisco I believe has an aggregate
option in ISIS (si
FWIW Ive rarely had a problem breaking out of ping/traceroute/etc on a Cisco.
I have found that Shift-Ctrl, then a very very small delay and 6 (while
still holding down Shift-Ctrl) works like a charm every time.
Maybe the terminals I use are just more friendly towards that sort of key
sequence th
On 23/02/2009 23:02, Tom Storey wrote:
Though the only thing it doesnt seem to help with is when you have no DNS
servers configured and mistype "configt", or some other command that
doesnt exist and it tries to resolve it through broadcast several times.
Ive found its futile to try and get out of
'No ip domain lookup' will solve your problem instance below. Eg dns resolution
attempt on typos.
-Original Message-
From: "Tom Storey"
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:32:28
To: Bruce Grobler
Cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X
FWIW Ive rarely had a problem breaking out of ping/tracer
Erm, what does that have to do with DNS lookups? :-)
> line con 0
> transport preferred none
> line vty 0 15
> transport preferred none
>
> Nick
>
> 'No ip domain lookup' will solve your problem instance below. Eg dns
True, but only really useful until you configure the device and it can
reach a DNS server, at which point you lose the ability to resolve any
hostname, but would be very handy in a lab where DNS is never likely to
exist I must
On 23/02/2009 23:51, Tom Storey wrote:
Erm, what does that have to do with DNS lookups? :-)
Nothing at all, except that it stops this behaviour:
... when you have no DNS
servers configured and mistype "configt", or some other command that
doesnt exist and it tries to resolve it through broadc
Is anyone else seeing a high rejection rate from charter.net email clients?
Yup, I knew that, sorry.
Ryan Rawdon wrote:
> You may want to try the mailop mailing list, which was created to try
> and shift mail operations traffic volume from NANOG: http://www.mailop.org/
>
> Good luck with your issue,
> Ryan
>
> John Martinez wrote:
>> Is anyone else seeing a high rejecti
Anybody actually on that list? Most of the serious mailops work is on
some other, entirely different lists.
And why do people have to think nanog is solely for packet pushing
related ops? Email is operational, and its often the first ops
failure that your users notice, right after the ones that
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Anybody actually on that list? Most of the serious mailops work is on
> some other, entirely different lists.
I followed up to John's message there. We're currently seeing
intermittent timeouts when connecting TCP/25 on ib1.charter.net as well
as timeouts after th
29 matches
Mail list logo
