On 23/12/2008, at 6:40 PM, Church, Charles wrote:
I help a buddy who works for a small ISP. I believe they're
ignoring or
null routing large chunks of APNIC. Their customers are aware of the
policy, and cool with it. Port scanning and other malicious stuff
dropped 50% afterwards.
That sor
Nathan Ward wrote:
Let me rephrase; Are there people who are filtering /24s received from
eBGP peers who do not have a default route?
of course.
Curiously, it was really meant as a rhetorical question where the answer
was "no".
Why are people doing this? Are they lacking clue, or, is there
Also one of the reason why not putting default route may be because of
recursive lookup from routing table.
If you have multi-homed site within your network with static route, and
if you use next-hop IP address instead of named interface, you will see
the problem when you have default route in rout
We are experiencing some unanticipated hardware issues
with the machine archive.routeviews.org.
This machine serves as the front-end to our primary data
archive. It also hosts http://www.routeviews.org/ and
is answering for route-views6.routeviews.org.
We are currently working to deploy a replac
What I was describing is filtering the announcements of /24s that are
part of larger allocations. Not filtering the announcements of "The
Swamp".
>-Original Message-
>From: Skywing [mailto:skyw...@valhallalegends.com]
>Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 7:08 PM
>To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu;
Calling Cogent, Avantel (AS 6503) and Axtel (AS 14000):
Axtel is announcing 100.10.10.0/24, which is within the 100.0.0.0/8 block,
which is unallocated according to
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/
I am seeing this from two of my transit providers, the common AS path is
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> Axtel is announcing 100.10.10.0/24, which is within the 100.0.0.0/8 block,
> which is unallocated according to
I'd love to see what that prefix is doing.. :)
Anyone have anything they can share?
adrian
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Calling Cogent, Avantel (AS 6503) and Axtel (AS 14000):
Axtel is announcing 100.10.10.0/24, which is within the 100.0.0.0/8 block,
which is unallocated according to
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/
As long as someone's try
What all good advertised, unallocated prefixes do... send mail...
(senderbase shows a fair amount of volume)
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>
> > Axtel is announcing 100.10.10.0/24, which is within the 100.0.0.0/8block,
> > w
Apparently they are - 219 of the 304 in the queue are for Yahoo - some
over 1280 minutes.
Or, as my boss put it when I mentioned that Yahoo was having e-mail
issues: "What's new?"
Chris Lauretano wrote:
Yep, experiencing the same here. The only e-mails stuck in the queue are
outbound to Ya
10 matches
Mail list logo
