Re: SMS Standards

2008-10-17 Thread John Bittenbender
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Bruce Pinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Glen Kent wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Apologies in advance since this is off-topic. However, posting in on >> nanog since i am confident that we will have some experts who would be

1st CFP: 1st Workshop LMPCNAP in ICNS 2009 | April 21-25, 2009 - Valencia, Spain

2008-10-17 Thread Jaime Lloret Mauri
INVITATION = Please consider to contribute to and/or forward to the appropriate groups the following opportunity to submit and publish original scientific or educational results. = == LMPCNAP 2009 | Call for Papers === CALL FOR PAPERS, TUT

Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster

2008-10-17 Thread Michael Simpson
On 10/16/08, Truman Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a good point that you brought up. > > Even though we already have IPv6 P2P (Nathan's post explains this in more > detail), it would still be quite interesting to provide IPv6 as a higher > class of traffic within service provider networks.

Fwd: [NANOG-announce] New NANOG Program Committee

2008-10-17 Thread Sue Joiner
- Forwarded Message - From: "Joe Provo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:59:35 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [NANOG-announce] New NANOG Program Committee On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:54:15AM -0400, Joe Provo wrote: > > In its last s

BGP Update Report

2008-10-17 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report Interval: 15-Sep-08 -to- 16-Oct-08 (32 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS9583 216771 3.0% 179.6 -- SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited 2 - AS1803 101971 1.4%

The Cidr Report

2008-10-17 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Oct 17 21:29:25 2008 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

RE: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster

2008-10-17 Thread michael.dillon
> As long as none of your ipv6 traffic transits across anything > from British Telecom as it is not supported on their 21st > Century Network > > parently-not.html> The distinction between supported, and unsupported is that when

Weekly Routing Table Report

2008-10-17 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMS Standards

2008-10-17 Thread Glen Kent
> Message delivery is best effort, so there are no guarantees that a message > will actually be delivered to its recipient and delay or complete loss of a > message is not uncommon, particularly when sending between networks. Users > may choose to request delivery reports (simply add *0# or *N# to

Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster

2008-10-17 Thread Nathan Ward
On 18/10/2008, at 12:18 AM, Michael Simpson wrote: On 10/16/08, Truman Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's a good point that you brought up. Even though we already have IPv6 P2P (Nathan's post explains this in more detail), it would still be quite interesting to provide IPv6 as a higher