Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits

2008-05-20 Thread Gadi Evron
On Mon, 19 May 2008, Deepak Jain wrote: > > Wouldn't this level of verification/authentication of running code be a > pretty trivial function via RANCID or similar tool? Absolutely, and it actually makes sense. The problem though is that it is one again an escalation war and counter-inventions k

[NANOG] Fiber Cut at 60 Hudson

2008-05-20 Thread Robert Blayzor
Does anyone know of any NY fiber cuts going on near/around 60 Hudson Street? I have a Level3 DIA Gig-E that's been out for almost 36 hours and each time I call them I get a different answer on what the problem is and exactly how much longer this is going to take to be resolved. We noticed

[NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Michal Krsek
Hello, several months ago we have had a discussion about IPv6 content. There has been a proposal that having some adult content IPv6 only should be a good idea. I'm not p0rn hoster, but I'm very close to IP content delivery network for Czech public TV. They have news channel (unfortunatelly for

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Max Tulyev
Hello Michael, I'm getting the permanent error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/temp $ mplayer http://master.nacevi.cz/ct24v6.asp MPlayer dev-SVN-rUNKNOWN-4.1.2 (C) 2000-2008 MPlayer Team CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz (Family: 6, Model: 15, Stepping: 13) CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
"Michal Krsek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > several months ago we have had a discussion about IPv6 content. There has > been a proposal that having some adult content IPv6 only should be a good > idea. > > I'm not p0rn hoster, but I'm very close to IP content delivery network for > C

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Nathan Ward
On 20/05/2008, at 11:56 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: > "Michal Krsek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hello, >> several months ago we have had a discussion about IPv6 content. >> There has >> been a proposal that having some adult content IPv6 only should be >> a good >> idea. >> >> I'm not p

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread GIULIANO (UOL)
_ > NANOG mailing list > NANOG@nanog.org > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog > > __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature > database 3113 (20080520) __ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Marc Manthey
hello, works on videolan osx leopard , just a few seconds then it stops , because my connections is not good enough 15:12:25.779523 IP6 mini.stattfernsehen.com.55362 > 2a02:1d0:2::217:a4ff:feaa:e6e7.ms-streaming: S 613680145:613680145(0) win 65535 15:12:25.852420 IP6 fe80::20f:66ff:fea7:2d

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Michal Krsek
Dear Marc, if you (or other users) have not enough capacity for watching 1.5 Mb/s stream, you can use lower (comodity) bitrate. You can use comodity URLs: http://master.nacevi.cz/asx/ct24livewh.asx (400 Kb/s) http://master.nacevi.cz/asx/ct24livewl.asx (225 Kb/s) Regards Mich

[NANOG] An account of the Estonian Internet War

2008-05-20 Thread Gadi Evron
About a year ago after coming back from Estonia I promised I'd send in an account of the Estonian "war". The postmortem analysis and recommendations I later wrote for the Estonian CERT are not yet public. A few months ago I wrote an article for the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, c

Re: [NANOG] Fiber Cut at 60 Hudson

2008-05-20 Thread virendra rode //
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Robert Blayzor wrote: > Does anyone know of any NY fiber cuts going on near/around 60 Hudson > Street? I have a Level3 DIA Gig-E that's been out for almost 36 hours > and each time I call them I get a different answer on what the problem >

[NANOG] AUTO: Kamal Mehta is on vacation (returning 05/21/2008)

2008-05-20 Thread Kamal Mehta
I am out of the office until 05/21/2008. I am on vacation and will not have access to e-mail. I will try to reply to your message on my return. If you need immediate assistance, please call the IBM AOD Service Center at 877-737-3700. Note: This is an automated response to your message

[NANOG] AUTO: Kamal Mehta is on vacation (returning 05/21/2008)

2008-05-20 Thread Kamal Mehta
I am out of the office until 05/21/2008. I am on vacation and will not have access to e-mail. I will try to reply to your message on my return. If you need immediate assistance, please call the IBM AOD Service Center at 877-737-3700. Note: This is an automated response to your message

[NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread William Herrin
Hi folks, An administrative question about multihoming: I have a client who needs to multihome with multiple vendors for reliability purposes, currently in the Northern Virginia area and later on with a fail-over site, probably in Hawaii. They have only a very modest need for bandwidth and addres

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread david raistrick
On Tue, 20 May 2008, William Herrin wrote: > The last I heard, the way to make this happen was: Find a service > provider with IP blocks available in ARIN's set of /8's that permit that part isn't required. Generally any /24 will do in my experience except for specific cases. Other than t

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Holmes,David A
If the same /24 is announced from 2 different sites, the problem we have run into is that using the longest prefix method is the only way to guarantee that some ISPs will not use some method such as private peering to cause asymmetric routing back to the small fry. -Original Message- From

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Marc Manthey
Am 20.05.2008 um 16:22 schrieb Michal Krsek: > Dear Marc, > if you (or other users) have not enough capacity for watching 1.5 Mb/ > s stream, you can use lower (comodity) bitrate. You can use comodity > URLs: > > http://master.nacevi.cz/asx/ct24livewh.asx (400 Kb/s) > > http://master.nacevi.cz

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Robert D. Scott
The /24 address block has to be portable, an assignment, or the owner needs to grant the secondary advertiser an LOA to readvertise that block. The LOA is pretty common, but some ISPs may require you to renumber to get into address space they will permit you to use and multihome. As always your mil

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Andy Dills
On Tue, 20 May 2008, William Herrin wrote: > Hi folks, > > An administrative question about multihoming: > > I have a client who needs to multihome with multiple vendors for > reliability purposes, currently in the Northern Virginia area and > later on with a fail-over site, probably in Hawaii.

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Tony Varriale
AFAIK, ARIN doesn't give out /22s anymore. Last time I went to the well...it's was a /20 or better. tv - Original Message - From: "Andy Dills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "William Herrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:05 PM Subject: Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Nathan Ward
On 21/05/2008, at 4:31 PM, Tony Varriale wrote: > AFAIK, ARIN doesn't give out /22s anymore. > > Last time I went to the well...it's was a /20 or better. Interesting.. I've had /24s for customers before, with APNIC's multi-homing assignments. http://www.apnic.net/info/faq/multihoming_faq.html

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

2008-05-20 Thread Michal Krsek
Hi Marc, > > if you (or other users) have not enough capacity for watching 1.5 Mb/ > > s stream, you can use lower (comodity) bitrate. You can use comodity > > URLs: > > > > http://master.nacevi.cz/asx/ct24livewh.asx (400 Kb/s) > > > > http://master.nacevi.cz/asx/ct24livewl.asx (225 Kb/s) > > exel

Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?

2008-05-20 Thread Andy Dills
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Tony Varriale wrote: > AFAIK, ARIN doesn't give out /22s anymore. > > Last time I went to the well...it's was a /20 or better. Nah, it's /22 for multi-homed networks, /20 for single-homed. http://www.arin.net/registration/guidelines/ipv4_initial_alloc.html 4.3.2.2 Multiho