Would anyone be willing to share their experience with Nortel as a core
switch platform off list? I am building out a small campus core and have
received proposal with dual ERS 8300s at the core but I have no experience,
anecdotal or otherwise, with Nortel in a switching capacity. I'll be happy
to
On 5/7/08, Tomas L. Byrnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what the issue is here.
>
> Just about every modern firewall I've used has an option to enable PMTU
> on interfaces, while blocking all other ICMP.
>
> Is MS not running something manufactured in the last 10 years at their
> p
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.5994:
Overall, I think it's actually pretty good. Paragraph 28(a)(2) and
especially when combined with 28(d)(2) have some interesting
potential unintended consequences, but, overall, it's short, to
the point, and, well written legislation in my opini
Apparently Thomas doesn't let you just publish a link to bills...
The link I published doesn't work.
There is also another net neutrality bill which would create a major FCC
process around the idea of evaluating net neutrality. Both bills
probably
have some merit.
To best read them, I suggest
I'm seeing a significant slowdown between Atlanta and Orlando. Anyone
else?
1 ...
2 ...
3 ...
4 ...
5 ...
6 POS5-1.GW4.NYC4.ALTER.NET (157.130.14.177) 10 ms 15 ms 33 ms
7 146.at-2-0-0.XR3.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.25.98) 26 ms 4 ms 4 ms
8 0.so-4-0-2.XL3.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.17.29)
Yes, there's a fiber cut that sprint is trying to route arround. We are being
impacted too.
--T
- Original Message -
From: Alan Halachmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Mon May 12 12:18:51 2008
Subject: [NANOG] Sprintlink ATL->MCO?
I'm seeing a significant slowdown betwee
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Owen DeLong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently Thomas doesn't let you just publish a link to bills...
>
> The link I published doesn't work.
That's because the automatic link detection in most readers doesn't
consider the trailing ":" as part of the link. B
Owen DeLong wrote:
> http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.5994:
>
> Overall, I think it's actually pretty good. Paragraph 28(a)(2) and
> especially when combined with 28(d)(2) have some interesting
> potential unintended consequences, but, overall, it's short, to
> the point, and, well
Just got this from InterNAP:
Hello,
This is notification of a fire in progress in the ACS building at 250
Williams Street in Atlanta. The building is currently being evacuated.
The fire is not in the datacenter and will have no impact on services or
equipment in the datacenter.
Internap ticket
New to the list, however there is a master ticket open w/Sprint (TK#2172676)
for a fiber cut in DC. Verizon was dispatched to the site, in which they
supposedly had to gain authorization from the Railroad to even work on the
facilities with an on-site time of Noon Central.
Sprint did not provide a
10 matches
Mail list logo