Re: windows update cache

2007-09-28 Thread Seth Mattinen
Adrian Chadd wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2007, Seth Mattinen wrote: Great if you're running a windows IT type LAN; crap if you're running an ISP! Why? It talks TCP/IP. How's it find the WSUS server again? Key Name: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate Value 0 Name:

Re: windows update cache

2007-09-28 Thread Seth Mattinen
Steve Gibbard wrote: On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Seth Mattinen wrote: Adrian Chadd wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2007, Joe Johnson wrote: Windows Software Update Services doesn't require the end-user to be part of a domain to get updates. You just need to define the WSUS server as the source for updates

Re: windows update cache

2007-09-28 Thread Seth Mattinen
Adrian Chadd wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2007, Joe Johnson wrote: Windows Software Update Services doesn't require the end-user to be part of a domain to get updates. You just need to define the WSUS server as the source for updates by changing a few registry entries and make sure the server is avai

Re: windows update cache

2007-09-28 Thread Robert Bonomi
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 28 13:05:54 2007 > Cc: Seth Mattinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, nanog@nanog.org > From: Warren Kumari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: windows update cache > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:32:36 -0400 > To: Steve Gibbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On Sep 28, 2007, at 1:05

Re: i think the cogent depeering thing is a myth of some kind

2007-09-28 Thread tariq biziou
> since i appear to be reaching the aforementioned web server by a path that > includes cogent-to-nlayer, i think this part of the plain text is inaccurate. route-views has no paths showing cogent/limelight and cogent/nlayer. > 7 p6-0.core01.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.234) 4.183 ms > 8 g