Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter

2007-09-08 Thread William Allen Simpson
Jon Lewis wrote: If filtering is inevitible, I think it's worth reviving the CIDR police and perhaps scaring some clue into the networks that stand to be filtered off the net by anyone needing to do any level of filtering. I agree. The first step would be figuring out the needed aggregate a

Re: Network Operations Guide

2007-09-08 Thread Nathan Ward
On 25/08/2007, at 7:04 AM, Bill Nash wrote: On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Bill Nash wrote: I built a perl daemon using Net::BGP and DBI that inserted and removed routes, on update, into an SQL db. I could then query to my hearts content, beating up a db with full routes with all the efficiency of S

Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter

2007-09-08 Thread Nathan Ward
On 8/09/2007, at 3:45 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote: In a message written on Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 07:14:01PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote: For some reason, today I started out with fewer routes (228289...yesterday, I started with 230686) with no filtering. RIR filter section Reduction in routes A

Re: [funsec] The "Great IPv6 experiment" (fwd)

2007-09-08 Thread Nathan Ward
On 5/09/2007, at 8:52 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: P.S. I'm writing this from behind a monopoly ISP who deliberately blocks all proto 41 traffic, and thus 6to4, so I have no idea what content, if any, the Experiment is actually providing... Anyone want to give me a Teredo relay for "research