Well, if they only delete 89% instead of 99.9% then to make 1,000,000 tasted
registrations they will have to keep 100,000 of them, which will send a fair
amount of money to the registry. Effectively making the minimum
registration costs for tasting 10% of the normal cost.
On 8/16/07, william(at)e
I find this to be a disturbing abuse issue by registrars as well... A good
example is a domain I owned, thedigitalfreeway.com ...it was owned by me and
used for a webhosting business:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060618003859/http://www.thedigitalfreeway.com/but
the business fell through as I had l
Hi,
Mail to RR users is getting refused due to PTR issues. I contacted
RR and explained that yea, one of our 2 DNS servers for the
IN-ADDR.ARPA is down, but the other is fine. They said that
I should either get the DNS server back up (Which of course
is already being worked on, was the minute i
Stephen Wilcox wrote:
>
> Given that the fastest edge connections (outside of Peter Lothbergs bathroom)
> are 10Gb this traffic can easily be directed to take out multiple parts of a
> networks critical connectivity.
(removed annoying cc's)
Well I was actually hoping Mrs. Lothberg would be th
Randy Bush wrote:
> the following post should not have come to me
apologies. this should not have gone to list, but to admin. my elisp
for nanog vacation abusers seems to need some updating.
randy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors
but google.com still show search engine.
For which your customers are grateful
Please advise how to do so more visitor in return? May the Gods be with you!
Mine prefers not to cheat.
--
Jeff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If I subscribe to the mailing list, and the "-post" mailing
un-blocker, there should be NO reason my e-mails should be
blocked to the NANOG list.
Right?
I mean, that's kinda the whole point, right?
Can someone please fix this?
This is broken, brok
Re-sending due to Merit's minor outage.
- ferg
-- Forwarded Message --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Robert Blayzor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The fact that they're rejecting on a 5xx error based on no DNS PTR is a=
bit harsh. While I'm all for requir
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:26:35PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > > Down is there isn't power to it until it gets repaired. So its not
> > > answering period. A "nslookup" shows "timed-out". A "dig" shows
> > > "connection timed out; no servers could be reach
9 matches
Mail list logo
