On 2/06/2007, at 4:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
the average number of v4 prefixes per AS is ~10, and it's rising. In
v6, the goal is that every PI site can use a single prefix**, meaning
the v6 routing table will be at least one (and two or even three
eventually) orders of magnitude smaller than t
On 30/05/2007, at 10:55 AM, Nathan Ward wrote:
I've got an idea that just fell out of my brain for web content
providers to get a handle on their 'ipv6-ability' - how many
eyeballs they would lose by adding www records.
I've implemented this, with some frills.
Code is at http://www
On 2-jun-2007, at 1:27, Fred Baker wrote:
But ULAs *do* require router magic. They require a policy to be in
place that causes them to not be advertised unless the policy is
overridden, and a policy that doesn't believe them even if they are
mistakenly advertised.
Well, there is no such
There are indeed a few thorny issues with this approach; the largest issue is
that all connectivity becomes DNS-dependent and raw IP addresses (from both
the inside and outside) become virtually useless. Running servers behind
this scheme, while doable, is difficult.
When an ISP's caching name
4 matches
Mail list logo
