In message
,
Christopher Morrow writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:22 , Christopher Morrow
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In message
> >>> ,
> >>> Christopher Morrow
> >>> writes
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:22 , Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>>
>>> In message
>>> ,
>>> Christopher Morrow
>>> writes:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim
wr
On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:22 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> In message
>> ,
>> Christopher Morrow
>> writes:
>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
4890
>>>
>>> it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault though
In message
,
Christopher Morrow writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > In message
> > ,
> > Christopher Morrow
> > writes:
> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim
> >> wrote:
> >> > 4890
> >>
> >> it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault thoug
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message
> ,
> Christopher Morrow
> writes:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>> > 4890
>>
>> it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault though... but sure.
>
> If you run a server you should be expecting PTB fo
In message
,
Christopher Morrow
writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > 4890
>
> it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault though... but sure.
If you run a server you should be expecting PTB for both IPv4 and
IPv6. If you have broken equipement in front of the
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> 4890
it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault though... but sure.
On 2012-12-18 08:08, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
On 2012-12-18 07:52, Christopher Morrow wrote:
see, now we're getting information that FDC/IRS could actually use!
:) This looks like an MTU issue then?
I believe so.
so, a suggestion t
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 2012-12-18 07:52, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>> see, now we're getting information that FDC/IRS could actually use!
>> :) This looks like an MTU issue then?
>
>
> I believe so.
so, a suggestion to eftps.gov/irs/fdc is to simply clamp
On 2012-12-18 07:52, Christopher Morrow wrote:
see, now we're getting information that FDC/IRS could actually use!
:) This looks like an MTU issue then?
I believe so.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 2012-12-18 07:36, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christopher Morrow
>>
>>> it's probably also fair to point out that ... it seems to be working.
>>> ( and A)
>>
>>
>> so, what's broken?
>
>
> The en
;>> Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net - Skype: linktechs
>>>> -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE -
>>>> 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
On 2012-12-18 07:36, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christopher Morrow
it's probably also fair to point out that ... it seems to be working.
( and A)
so, what's broken?
The end-user machines I tested on are behind 6in4 tunnels (MTU 1480).
They open the TCP c
s
>>> -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE -
>>> 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Darren Pilgrim [mailto:na...@bitfreak.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, D
ith www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE -
>> 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Darren Pilgrim [mailto:na...@bitfreak.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:09 AM
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: www.eftps
p://www.linktechs.net - Skype: linktechs
> -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G
> - 3.65 - TV Whitespace
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Pilgrim [mailto:na...@bitfreak.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:09 AM
&g
E - 3G -
3.65 - TV Whitespace
-Original Message-
From: Darren Pilgrim [mailto:na...@bitfreak.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:09 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: www.eftps.gov contact
The hostname www.eftps.gov has both A and records, but the site is only
reachable via IPv
The hostname www.eftps.gov has both A and records, but the site is
only reachable via IPv4. Worse, the IPv6 connectivity is broken in such
a way that Firefox and Internet Explorer do not fall back to IPv4.
Tracing is broken for both protocols. The 10-net addresss in the IPv4
path were cu
18 matches
Mail list logo
