>Anyone out there have experience with Riverbed Steelhead products?
>Do they improve TCP performance over WAN links? is it worth the price?
>mike
---
James and Eric have done outstanding contributing here. I just wanted to add a
tad bit of information leaving out
ose guys at the time were
>> connected to the US office over MLPPP (4 T1s). Samba sucked for them along
>> with everything else.
>>
>
> Yes, deployment of most WAN accelerators that will do file caching will if
> not gain love from your users, it at least gets them off your b
your users, it at least gets them off your back.
-James
The only issue I had with Riverbed is their licensing model feels very
backwards. It took me a while to understand what we needed.
Andrey
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Jonathan Fernattwrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:49 PM, harbor235
ernatt wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:49 PM, harbor235 wrote:
>
> > Anyone out there have experience with Riverbed Steelhead products?
> > Do they improve TCP performance over WAN links? is it worth the price?
> >
> >
> > mike
> >
>
> I've h
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:49 PM, harbor235 wrote:
> Anyone out there have experience with Riverbed Steelhead products?
> Do they improve TCP performance over WAN links? is it worth the price?
>
>
> mike
>
I've had good experiences with both Riverbed Steelhead and Cisco W
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:49 PM, harbor235 wrote:
> Anyone out there have experience with Riverbed Steelhead products?
> Do they improve TCP performance over WAN links? is it worth the price?
>
I'll let others answer the specific question about Riverbed. I've heard
plenty o
flows are tore down and reconstructed.
HTH,
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 1:58 PM
To: 'harbor235'; 'NANOG list'
Subject: RE: riverbed steelhead
> -Original Message-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 2:58 PM
> To: 'harbor235'; 'NANOG list'
> Subject: RE: riverbed steelhead
>
> I've had generally good experiences w/ Riverbe
> -Original Message-
> From: harbor235 [mailto:harbor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 2:50 PM
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: riverbed steelhead
>
> Anyone out there have experience with Riverbed Steelhead products?
> Do they improve TCP performance ove
Anyone out there have experience with Riverbed Steelhead products?
Do they improve TCP performance over WAN links? is it worth the price?
mike
10 matches
Mail list logo
