Hurricane Electric now supports "Never via route servers" (the peeringdb flag)

Hurricane Electric now supports "Never via route servers" (the peeringdb flag) as part of our route filtering algorithm. Using peeringdb, an ASN may indicate that its routes should never be learned via route servers. As a simple detection method, currently route servers are detect

Re: PeeringDB Hackathon - looking for feature requests

On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:35 PM Steve McManus wrote: > > PeeringDB is looking at participating at an upcoming NANOG Hackathon. One of > the ideas for a theme is to improve the API. Specifically by adding API calls > for common use cases that people need to handle outsid

Fwd: [PDB Announce] Publication of Guidelines for Registering in PeeringDB

Hi, There was a recent discussion on this list about registering in PeeringDB, so I am forwarding this announcement about the publication of the guidelines used and the process in place to improve them when needed. Kind regards, Leo -- Forwarded message - From: Leo Vegoda Date

Re: PeeringDB Hackathon - looking for feature requests

Thanks to all who submitted ideas for improving the API - we've added those to the backlog and plan to work on them in future PeeringDB releases or Hackathons. We ended up moving to the IPv6 theme for the NANOG Hackathon - PeeringDB has several items available to work on around impr

PeeringDB 2021 User Survey

Hi All, Another year has passed since our 2020 survey so we're doing it again. As before, we'd like to hear what's working, what's not, and what could be better with PeeringDB. Last year's survey heavily influenced our roadmap and development over the past year. Y

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: PeeringDB Hackathon - looking for feature requests

I agree that this would be an interesting feature as it is something we commonly do over here using two or more queries. -B -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Alarig Le Lay Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 3:10 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: PeeringDB

Re: PeeringDB Hackathon - looking for feature requests

On Thu 12 Aug 2021 15:27:48 GMT, Steve McManus wrote: > PeeringDB is looking at participating at an upcoming NANOG Hackathon. > One of the ideas for a theme is to improve the API. Specifically by > adding API calls for common use cases that people need to handle > outside of the API. T

PeeringDB Hackathon - looking for feature requests

PeeringDB is looking at participating at an upcoming NANOG Hackathon. One of the ideas for a theme is to improve the API. Specifically by adding API calls for common use cases that people need to handle outside of the API. Typically, by dumping the entire database to SQL For example - given two

Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

That could be Justin, based on the timeline from domain registration to ARIN Object Creation ( Network and Abuse ) to PeeringDB Contact Update. That doesn't explain the recent update to Public Peering Info on 2021-03-07T20:35:22 months after the ASN stopped routing any IP space. The domain

Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

Yeah, I know a couple of people who have thrown massive peeringdb operations up just to make them look big but their routing table analysis looks nothing like what they say they have. James W. Breeden Managing Partner [cid:3c34773f-9c3e-42cf-87ba-144ee1fa163f] Arenal Group: Arenal

Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

I see from peering db: 2020-07-01T14:22:01Z According to the bg.he.net link AS18894 has not been visible in the global routing table since November 28, 2020 The information displayed is from that time. Are they causing you or someone issues Eric? Maybe they went out of business? Many businesses

Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

On 05/03/2021 01:14, Eric Kuhnke wrote: First, take a look at this: https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894 Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis tools): https://bgp.he.net/AS18894 https://stat.ripe.net/18894

Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

supp...@peeringdb.com is fairly prominently displayed at the bottom of every page that peeringdb displays. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:16 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote: > First, take a look at this: > > https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894 > > > Now look at these (or use your own

Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

First, take a look at this: https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894 Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis tools): https://bgp.he.net/AS18894 https://stat.ripe.net/18894 The claimed prefixes announced, traffic levels and POPs appear to have no correlation with reality in global v4/

Re: STOP USING FONT SIZE SMALL Was: Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

that almost everyone in here knows that LOAs for Cross > Connects in Datacenters and Telecom Rooms can be a pain... > > > > > > I don't know if I'm suggesting something that already exists. > > > Or even if I'm suggesting something that could be unpopular for

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

>>> you can sign over something which ways "the person identified by the >>> following public key is to be permitted to ..." >> >> you mean the fraudlent attacker who owned that INR seems to have signed >> this request for a €1.000.000,49 wire transfer to their iban. a person >> is not identified

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 8:50 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > > you can sign over something which ways "the person identified by the > > following public key is to be permitted to ..." > > you mean the fraudlent attacker who owned that INR seems to have signed > this request for a €1.000.000,49 wire trans

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

> you can sign over something which ways "the person identified by the > following public key is to be permitted to ..." you mean the fraudlent attacker who owned that INR seems to have signed this request for a €1.000.000,49 wire transfer to their iban. a person is not identified by that signatu

Re: STOP USING FONT SIZE SMALL Was: Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

> Really, does anyone here think that it is good form to send email with > font size *SMALL*? rofl! randy --- ra...@psg.com `gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd ra...@psg.com` signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header mangling

STOP USING FONT SIZE SMALL Was: Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

that almost everyone in here knows that LOAs for Cross Connects > > in Datacenters and Telecom Rooms can be a pain... > > > > I don't know if I'm suggesting something that already exists. > > Or even if I'm suggesting something that could be unpopular for some r

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

think this detached signature model is good :-) On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 6:31 AM Randy Bush wrote: > > >> What if PeeringDB would be the CA for the Facilities? > >> Supposedly this solves the CA problem of the "Colo Folks". > > > > I think pushing your sec

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

>> What if PeeringDB would be the CA for the Facilities? >> Supposedly this solves the CA problem of the "Colo Folks". > > I think pushing your security identification out (as the notional > equinix) to a third party where you can't revoke/change/etc is ask

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 2:44 PM Douglas Fischer wrote: > > What if PeeringDB would be the CA for the Facilities? > Supposedly this solves the CA problem of the "Colo Folks". > I think pushing your security identification out (as the notional equinix) to a third party

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

What if PeeringDB would be the CA for the Facilities? Supposedly this solves the CA problem of the "Colo Folks". Would PeeringDB be interested in that? Em seg., 22 de fev. de 2021 às 16:04, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.li...@gmail.com> escreveu: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 2:06 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > >> way back, the rirs were very insistant that their use of rpki authority > >> was most emphatically not to be considered an identity service. this > >> permeated the design; e.g., organization names were specifically > >> forbidden in certif

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

>> way back, the rirs were very insistant that their use of rpki authority >> was most emphatically not to be considered an identity service. this >> permeated the design; e.g., organization names were specifically >> forbidden in certificate CN, Subject Alternative Name, etc. >> > > yup, I agree

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 1:39 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > > are you asking about something like this: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-rsc/ > > > > Which COULD be used to, as an AS holder: > > "sign something to be sent between you and the colo and your intended >

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

> are you asking about something like this: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-rsc/ > > Which COULD be used to, as an AS holder: > "sign something to be sent between you and the colo and your intended peer" > > that you could sign (with your rpki stuffs) and your

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

> But it looks like a "crypto sign and publishes" anything related to an > organization. that is the problem with this discussion. it does not. it allows one to show ownership of an AS or prefix. it does not show ownership or authority over an organization. keep your trust model straight. ran

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

But every time I need to deal with some Cross-Connect LOA, and mostly > when we face some rework on data mistakes, I dream with a "PeeringDB for > Cross Connects". > > > > are you asking about something like this: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spaghetti-

Re: LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

'm suggesting something that could be unpopular for some reason. > > But every time I need to deal with some Cross-Connect LOA, and mostly when we > face some rework on data mistakes, I dream with a "PeeringDB for Cross > Connects". > are you asking about something lik

LOAs for Cross Connects - Something like PeeringDB for XC

I need to deal with some Cross-Connect LOA, and mostly when we face some rework on data mistakes, I dream with a "PeeringDB for Cross Connects". So, this mail is a question and also a suggestion. There is something like an "online notary's office" exclusive for Cross-Conn

Re: PeeringDB Satisfaction Survey open now til November 20th

We're still looking for more responses to the PeeringDB survey. Most people took about 2-3 minutes to fill it in, so it's pretty short. Please give us your feedback if you have a moment: https://surveyhero.com/c/f7be5236 -Steve > On Nov 2, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Steve M

PeeringDB Satisfaction Survey open now til November 20th

PeeringDB is a non-profit, freely available, user-maintained, database of networks, and the go-to location for interconnection data. The database facilitates the global interconnection of networks at Internet Exchange Points (IXPs), data centers, and other interconnection facilities, and is the

Re: Looking for a AS15169 Google contact to update their PeeringDB records

I'm sure someone else already contacted you, but in the off chance that didn't happen :) maybe find me privately and we can chat? :) On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:43 PM Siyuan Miao wrote: > Hi, > > We're noticed that PeeringDB records of AS15169 in IX.br (PTT.br) São >

Re: Looking for a AS15169 Google contact to update their PeeringDB records

wrote: > Hi, > > We're noticed that PeeringDB records of AS15169 in IX.br (PTT.br) São > Paulo is outdated. > > I've tried to contact AS15169 to update it via IX Session Turnup ticket > and n...@google.com but didn't get a reasonable response. > > That

Looking for a AS15169 Google contact to update their PeeringDB records

Hi, We're noticed that PeeringDB records of AS15169 in IX.br (PTT.br) São Paulo is outdated. I've tried to contact AS15169 to update it via IX Session Turnup ticket and n...@google.com but didn't get a reasonable response. That's what I got from n...@google.com: > Dea

Re: peeringdb contact me please

Hi Erich, everyone, On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 02:02:15PM -0600, Kaiser, Erich wrote: > Anyone out there from PeeringDB, please contact me offlist, we are > having trouble updating our records. You can reach PeeringDB support at supp...@peeringdb.com. Feel free to CC me. Kind regards, Job

peeringdb contact me please

Anyone out there from PeeringDB, please contact me offlist, we are having trouble updating our records. Erich Kaiser The Fusion Network er...@gotfusion.net Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291

Reminder: PeeringDB Product Committee Charter Survey / NANOG

On 29.09.2016 21:52, Arnold Nipper wrote: > Hello PeeringDB users / hello NANOG, > > the PeeringDB Product Committee (PC, [0]) is charged with steering the > future product development and running the market outreach efforts to > continuously improve the value that PeeringDB

PeeringDB Product Committee Charter Survey / NANOG

Hello PeeringDB users / hello NANOG, the PeeringDB Product Committee (PC, [0]) is charged with steering the future product development and running the market outreach efforts to continuously improve the value that PeeringDB delivers to the networks registered with PeeringDB, and the broader

Re: PeeringDB ?

, 2016 at 12:13:18PM +0200, Marco Paesani wrote: >> Whats happened today at PeeringDB web site ? > > And PeeringDB is back in business! > http://instituut.net/~job/screenshots/2f255c17a8aa9cb99121b448.png > > A post-mortem will be shared on the pdb-tech@ list later today. > > Kind regards, > > Job

Re: PeeringDB ?

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13:18PM +0200, Marco Paesani wrote: > Whats happened today at PeeringDB web site ? And PeeringDB is back in business! http://instituut.net/~job/screenshots/2f255c17a8aa9cb99121b448.png A post-mortem will be shared on the pdb-tech@ list later today. Kind regards, Job

Re: PeeringDB ?

o Paesani wrote: > > Whats happened totady at PeeringDB web site ? > > We ran out of peerings, but as we speak our service provider is printing > new ones ;-) > > In all seriousness: our SP has issues with a storage array. The staff is > aware and they are hard working to res

Re: PeeringDB ?

Hi Marco, On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13:18PM +0200, Marco Paesani wrote: > Whats happened totady at PeeringDB web site ? We ran out of peerings, but as we speak our service provider is printing new ones ;-) In all seriousness: our SP has issues with a storage array. The staff is aware and t

Re: PeeringDB ?

https://twitter.com/PeeringDB/status/735026726053531649 Not sure it’s known yet :D Regards, Marty Strong -- CloudFlare - AS13335 Network Engineer ma...@cloudflare.com +44 7584 906 055 smartflare (Skype) http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335 > On 24

PeeringDB ?

Whats happened totady at PeeringDB web site ? Kind regards, Marco Paesani Skype: mpaesani Mobile: +39 348 6019349 Success depends on the right choice ! Email: ma...@paesani.it

Re: PeeringDB survey results and Board election plan

ghu saave us from more committees

PeeringDB survey results and Board election plan

Ohai NANOG! Many of you are probably familiar with "PeeringDB", one of the most awesome resources for interconnection. :-) What some of you might not realise, is that PeeringDB is evolving from a bunch of php scripts into a real organisation with a board and appropiate legal registra

Fwd: PeeringDB 2.0 Rollout And Governance Announcement

[ Forwarding today's announcement, apologies for duplicates ] --- Hi Everyone! PeeringDB is rolling our the first major revision since its inception, PeeringDB 2.0. This email will explain the basics, and how you can learn more information if you are interested. F

Re: PeeringDB Admin

n, Jun 01, 2015 at 04:47:49PM -0500, Jason Bothe wrote: >> Could I please have a PeeringDB admin contact me off-list ? > > Done! > > Kind regards, > > Job >

Re: PeeringDB Admin

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 04:47:49PM -0500, Jason Bothe wrote: > Could I please have a PeeringDB admin contact me off-list ? Done! Kind regards, Job

Re: PeeringDB Admin

* ja...@rice.edu (Jason Bothe) [Mon 01 Jun 2015, 23:51 CEST]: Could I please have a PeeringDB admin contact me off-list ? I've mailed their support alias several times and have literally always had quick and to-the-point answers. -- Niels.

PeeringDB Admin

Could I please have a PeeringDB admin contact me off-list ? Thanks! Jason Bothe, Manager of Networking Rice University o +1 713 348 5500 m +1 713 703 3552 ja...@rice.edu

Re: PeeringDB missing NOC role option?

And to answer myself. If you select "Ops." it will display NOC as the role on the regular display page. On 14-12-01 10:20 AM, Greg Estabrooks wrote: > > > Hey All, > > > Has anyone else notice the NOC option missing from their PeeringDB contacts? > &g

Re: peeringdb

On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Justin Wilson wrote: > Trying to update some records on peeringdb.com and am not getting much > response. Just wondering if I am the only one. I am not getting > response back from support. Figured this would be a good place to ask. > More curious than anyt

peeringdb

Trying to update some records on peeringdb.com and am not getting much response. Just wondering if I am the only one. I am not getting response back from support. Figured this would be a good place to ask. More curious than anything. Thanks, Justin -- Justin Wilson http://www.mtin.net

RE: peeringdb contact help

Replying off list -Original Message- From: "Bryan King" Sent: ‎8/‎15/‎2014 15:08 To: "'nanog@nanog.org'" Subject: peeringdb contact help I've been trying for 3 days now to get a response from supp...@peeringdb.com<mailto:supp...@peeringdb.com>

peeringdb contact help

I've been trying for 3 days now to get a response from supp...@peeringdb.com<mailto:supp...@peeringdb.com>. Someone from peeringdb please respond off list please...

Re: peeringdb accuracy research

On 13/06/2013 17:48, Job Snijders wrote: > Good news everyone, 99% of the parsable data in PeeringDB is valid! :-) you mean: 99% of the parsable data in PeeringDB which is maintained by people conscientious enough to provide the output of "show bgp sum" from their routers, is vali

Re: peeringdb accuracy research

My dear fellow networkers, Good news everyone, 99% of the parsable data in PeeringDB is valid! :-) Measuring this number would have been inpossible without all the submissions to the research app. Thank you! If you are interested in the details, please see these slides: http

peeringdb accuracy research

Dear fellow networkers, I need your help! For the good of PeeringDB I am researching the accuracy of the current PeeringDB data set. We plan to compare three sources of information: peeringdb itself, publicly available listings from IXP operators ... and the ultimate source of truth: user

Re: Why use PeeringDB?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > Good point. I suspect that enough large users (with money, developers, > hosting, etc.) are enjoying it that it has reached a critical mass of > a semi-core service that wont have a hard time getting some support > going forward. At the m

Re: Why use PeeringDB?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Zaid Ali wrote: > The goal is "Source of truth" for any peer to know information at the > Exchange points as well as peering coordinator information. I think it is > a great tool for the peering community and definitely useful. Cons: Will > it be the next RADB? The

Re: Why use PeeringDB?

it running since it is a volunteer effort. Zaid On 7/18/12 8:43 AM, "Chris Grundemann" wrote: >Peering Experts, > >I am currently working on a BCOP for IPv6 Peering and Transit and >would very much appreciate some expert information on why using >PeeringDB is a best prac

Re: Why use PeeringDB?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote: > I am currently working on a BCOP for IPv6 Peering and Transit and > would very much appreciate some expert information on why using > PeeringDB is a best practice (or why its not). All opinions are > welcome, but be aware th

Re: Why use PeeringDB?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote: > I am currently working on a BCOP for IPv6 Peering and Transit and > would very much appreciate some expert information on why using > PeeringDB is a best practice (or why its not). All opinions are > welcome, but be aware th

Why use PeeringDB?

Peering Experts, I am currently working on a BCOP for IPv6 Peering and Transit and would very much appreciate some expert information on why using PeeringDB is a best practice (or why its not). All opinions are welcome, but be aware that I plan on using the responses to enhance the document

Re: Peeringdb down?

tion closed by foreign host. > > cheers, > Ethern > > ==** > Ethern Lin > Network Division > Computing Center, ACADEMIA SINICA > AS Number: 9264 > Phone: +886-2-66149953 > TANet VoIP: 93909953 > Fax: +886-2-66146444 > ===

Re: Peeringdb down?

9953 TANet VoIP: 93909953 Fax: +886-2-66146444 == ? 2012/6/15 ?? 02:41, Righa Shake ??: Hey, Anybody able to access peeringdb today? Regards, Righa Shake On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Darius Jahandariewrote: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Darius Jahandar

Re: Peeringdb down?

Hey, Anybody able to access peeringdb today? Regards, Righa Shake On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Darius Jahandarie wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Darius Jahandarie > wrote: > > However, when the web interface goes down, usually you can still get > > information

Re: Peeringdb down?

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Darius Jahandarie wrote: > However, when the web interface goes down, usually you can still get > information with the whois and finger interfaces: And of course, this is what I meant by the finger interface: d82h214:~ Darius$ finger as4...@peeringdb.com Still

Re: Peeringdb down?

dy anywhere. > > I'm seeing MySQL errors when attempting to query peeringdb.com this morning. > I'm assuming the admins or friends of admins lurk here. :) > > IE: > > Database error: Invalid SQL: . > MySQL Error: 1030 (Got error 28 from storage engine) > Sess

Peeringdb down?

I already sent an email to supp...@peeringdb.com about this, but I'm uncertain they are receiving email properly, so I'll mention it here as well. I hadn't seen mention of it already anywhere. I'm seeing MySQL errors when attempting to query peeringdb.com this morni

Re: PeeringDB contact

Patrick (et al.) On 20.04.2010 15:04 Patrick Sumby wrote > Sadly not, I've sent a number of emails to supp...@peeringdb.com and had > no reply :( which is why I'm here! > if you run into the same problem pls feel free to contact anyone listed as peeringDB admin (see e.g. h

Re: PeeringDB contact

Hi Arnold, Sadly not, I've sent a number of emails to supp...@peeringdb.com and had no reply :( which is why I'm here! Cheers Patrick Arnold Nipper wrote: Hi Patrick, On 20.04.2010 14:14 Patrick Sumby wrote Could someone from PeeringDB contact me off-list please. Or if anyo

Re: PeeringDB contact

Hi Patrick, On 20.04.2010 14:14 Patrick Sumby wrote > Could someone from PeeringDB contact me off-list please. Or if anyone > has any contact details other than the supp...@peeringdb.com address > that would be much appreciated. > does supp...@peeringdb.com not work for you?

PeeringDB contact

Hi, Could someone from PeeringDB contact me off-list please. Or if anyone has any contact details other than the supp...@peeringdb.com address that would be much appreciated. Thanks Patrick

RE: peeringdb admin contact?

They always respond very quickly anytime I email them you sure there isn't any spam filters etc. playing nasty on you? ;) -Original Message- From: matthew zeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 13, 2008 3:53 PM To: NANOG Subject: peeringdb admin contact? Been trying t

Re: peeringdb admin contact?

Hi! Been trying to get someone from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get back to me but haven't had any luck. Anyone? If you have someone responding. we have created accounts there for a couple of our customers, but still are read only level. Not really handu if you ask people on peeringforum.eu to joi

Re: peeringdb admin contact?

On Oct 13, 2008, at 3:52 PM, matthew zeier wrote: Been trying to get someone from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get back to me but haven't had any luck. Anyone? [EMAIL PROTECTED] The e-mail address is on the front page of , you don't even have to log in to see it. Tha

peeringdb admin contact?

Been trying to get someone from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get back to me but haven't had any luck. Anyone?