Re: nanog53 network status

2011-10-10 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Noah Weis" > We identified a link between 2 switches that was having intermittent > physical errors just a bit ago. The offending copper bits have been thrown > to the depths of hell. There were several access points in the center of > Millenium Hall that wer

Re: nanog53 network status

2011-10-10 Thread Noah Weis
More on network status: We identified a link between 2 switches that was having intermittent physical errors just a bit ago. The offending copper bits have been thrown to the depths of hell. There were several access points in the center of Millenium Hall that were fed via this link and, as such,

Re: nanog53 network status

2011-10-10 Thread Noah Weis
Nick, we actually do limit the client power settings, by default, for the very reasons you mention. Noah On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 10/10/2011 16:01, Anton Kapela wrote: > > Please relay any outstanding issues my way--I'll route to Verilan, > > which is handling

Re: nanog53 network status

2011-10-10 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 10/10/2011 16:01, Anton Kapela wrote: > Please relay any outstanding issues my way--I'll route to Verilan, > which is handling the network and wireless support for the meeting. If Verilan has the ability to limit client power settings, these should also be reduced as far as possible. Some dri

nanog53 network status

2011-10-10 Thread Anton Kapela
Attendees, At present, we're aware of several issues affecting access to the NANOG attendee network -- in short, they include: -Apparent 'lumping' of iDevices, picking 11b/g channels of "1" and "6" (while channel 11 AP's sid idly by); adjusting additional AP's power and channel configuration to p