Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 nanog@nanog.org

2012-09-20 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sep 19, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Brett Frankenberger wrote: > It works fine if the gateway has multiple routing tables (VRF or > equivalent) and application software that is multiple-routing-table > aware. If you are arguing that it is technically possible to build an environment in which every piece

Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 nanog@nanog.org

2012-09-20 Thread Robert Bonomi
> From jrh...@netconsonance.com Wed Sep 19 20:47:44 2012 > Subject: Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 > nanog@nanog.org > From: Jo Rhett > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:46:54 -0700 > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > To: Robert Bonomi > > > --Apple

Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 nanog@nanog.org

2012-09-19 Thread Brett Frankenberger
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 06:46:54PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > > For these networks to have gateways which connect to the outside, you > have to have an understanding of which IP networks are inside, and > which IP networks are outside. Your proxy client then forwards > connections to "outside" netwo

Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 nanog@nanog.org

2012-09-19 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:46:54 -0700, Jo Rhett said: > You're all missing the point in grand style. Given that the entire thread is based on somebody who missed the point in totally grand style and managed to get press coverage of said missing the point, I am starting to suspect that several people

Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 nanog@nanog.org

2012-09-19 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sep 19, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > In the financial and/or brokerage communities, there are internal networks > with enough 'high value'/sensitive information to justify "air gap" > isolation from the outide world. > > Also, in those industries, there are 'semi-isolated' networks

Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 nanog@nanog.org

2012-09-19 Thread Robert Bonomi
> From: Jo Rhett > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:42:30 -0700 > Subject: Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 [[ sneck ]] > > And second, have you ever worked on a private intranet that wasn't > connected to the internet through a firewall? Skipping oob networks for > equipm

Re: Can somebody stop nanog@nanog.org from forwarding spam, kthx!

2011-07-12 Thread Brielle Bruns
On 7/12/11 9:47 AM, Ryan Pavely wrote: As far as I can tell me neither. I feel so left out :( You probably don't have nanog@nanog.org and its associated mail servers whitelisted in spamassassin/filtering/etc. In an effort to avoid bouncing list mail, I put them in a while

Re: Can somebody stop nanog@nanog.org from forwarding spam, kthx!

2011-07-12 Thread Ryan Pavely
As far as I can tell me neither. I feel so left out :( Ryan Pavely Director Research And Development Net Access Corporation http://www.nac.net/ On 7/12/2011 10:43 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote: jer...@unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) wrote: I am fairly sure that the fake "Western Union" mess

Re: Can somebody stop nanog@nanog.org from forwarding spam, kthx!

2011-07-12 Thread Elmar K. Bins
jer...@unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) wrote: > I am fairly sure that the fake "Western Union" message and various other > spams that are dripping through are from real subscribers... Err... what I find most interesting is that I have received no spam via this list today. I've checked my spamfilters' g

Can somebody stop nanog@nanog.org from forwarding spam, kthx!

2011-07-12 Thread Jeroen Massar
91C39502 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:55:53 -0700 (PDT) by s0.nanog.org with smtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QgYTR-000O9p-FX for nanog@nanog.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:37:46 + X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 599896.49560...@omp