--- morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Christopher Morrow
One good reason to not do link encryption is: "the problem is that
whackadoodle box you put outside the router!" :( most often those
boxes can't do light-level monitoring, loopbacks, etc... all the stuff
your NOC wants to do when 'link
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> One might look at MS's documentation about deploying end-to-end ipsec
>> in their enterprise for one example of peer-to-peer ubiquitous ipsec.
>
> This is interesting and kind of what I'm looking for. Do you ha
Christopher Morrow wrote:
> One might look at MS's documentation about deploying end-to-end ipsec
> in their enterprise for one example of peer-to-peer ubiquitous ipsec.
This is interesting and kind of what I'm looking for. Do you have a
pointer to this documentation?
My apologies for not hav
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:30 AM, David Barak wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Please define "large scale". Is that by number of endpoints, throughput, or
> some other metric? How big is big?
>
it's fair to believe that there are 'lots' of ipsec deployments where
there are ~1000 or so endpoints (network en
Hi Jan,
Please define "large scale". Is that by number of endpoints,
throughput, or some other metric? How big is big?
David Barak
Can you give us an idea of “large scale” in your mind? Also, site to site
deployments or remote access or both?
Paul
On 11/1/2013, 9:38 AM, "Jan Schaumann" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Who here on this list has deployed IPSec or other comparable lower layer
>encryption in a large scale environment, or a
Hello,
Who here on this list has deployed IPSec or other comparable lower layer
encryption in a large scale environment, or attempted to do so?
I've repeatedly heard claims that doing so is not feasible (either
operationally or financially), but I have not seen any specific studies,
reports, numb
7 matches
Mail list logo
