to:matt.new...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 7:18 PM
To: Saku Ytti; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: internet routing table in a vrf
If you run PIC and hide the next hop information between a loopback
which is what will happen in a vpn environment you will lose awareness of
the fai
On Mar 8, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2013-03-08 18:17 +), Matt Newsom wrote:
>
>> If you run PIC and hide the next hop information between a loopback
>> which is what will happen in a vpn environment
>
> Typical SP network has next-hop-self in INET BGP, and does not car
On (2013-03-08 18:17 +), Matt Newsom wrote:
> If you run PIC and hide the next hop information between a loopback
> which is what will happen in a vpn environment
Typical SP network has next-hop-self in INET BGP, and does not carry
edge-links in IGP. You don't want to have lot of prefix
Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 11:23 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: internet routing table in a vrf
On (2013-03-08 16:40 +), Matt Newsom wrote:
> 2) forward plane (recursive lookup issues)
> Most platforms program prefix's with associated labels s
On (2013-03-08 16:40 +), Matt Newsom wrote:
> 2) forward plane (recursive lookup issues)
> Most platforms program prefix's with associated labels slower so
> your base convergence will suffer.
Do you have any reference you could share? What level of penalty per prefix
have you obs
m]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 2:23 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: internet routing table in a vrf
hi
I would to enquire about the cons/pros of running a full internet routing table
in a vrf and the potential challenges of operating it in a VPN cross a large
network that does peering and provide tra
Hi
1) control plane (route reflectors )
- you can either run a separate control plane infrastructure for inet vrf or
you can use common RRs that depends on your hardware capabilities (or you
can run a separate BGP process for reflecting inet vrf).
- no need to worry about data-plane as VPN rout
es, it
was in a VRF, but I was not running MPLS.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Dan White wrote:
> On 03/07/13 22:22 +0200, beavis daniels wrote:
>
>> hi
>>
>> I would to enquire about the cons/pros of running a full internet routing
>> table in a vrf and the potent
On 03/07/13 22:22 +0200, beavis daniels wrote:
hi
I would to enquire about the cons/pros of running a full internet routing
table in a vrf and the potential challenges of operating it in a VPN cross
a large network that does peering and provide transit.
I not a fan to support running it in a
hi
I would to enquire about the cons/pros of running a full internet routing
table in a vrf and the potential challenges of operating it in a VPN cross
a large network that does peering and provide transit.
I not a fan to support running it in a vrf.
I am looking for a list of operational and
10 matches
Mail list logo
