Oahu HI undersea cable attack disrupted by federal agents

2022-04-13 Thread Sean Donelan
https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2022/04/13/hsi-agents-honolulu-disrupted-cyberattack-undersea-cable-critical-telecommunications/ Homeland Security Investigations says it was able to disrupt a cyberattack of a critical undersea cable, adding the hackers sought to target “infrastructure on Oahu.”

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-03-09 Thread Jared Mauch
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 12:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > since we're at this layer, should i worry about going 3m with dacs at > low speed, i.e. 10g? may need to do runs to neighbor rack. No. We even do this for 100G. - Jared

RE: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-03-08 Thread adamv0025
> Warren Kumari > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 4:31 PM > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:20 AM Coy Hile wrote: > > > > On 2020-02-26 11:14, Randy Bush wrote: > > >> We use plenty of multi-mode, but only in the data centre, between > > >> our own kit, for racks within the same cage. > > > > > >

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Nick Hilliard
Randy Bush wrote on 26/02/2020 16:14: We use plenty of multi-mode, but only in the data centre, between our own kit, for racks within the same cage. so you have to stock both single and multi? hmmm in-cabinet multimode can make sense, as long as you keep the stock types contained, i.e. high

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Simon Leinen
Randy Bush writes: > since we're at this layer, should i worry about going 3m with dacs at > low speed, i.e. 10g? may need to do runs to neighbor rack. No, 3m is totally fine for passive DAC, never had any issues with those. (5m should also be fine, we just have less experience with that because

Re: [External] Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Hunter Fuller
nah. We do up to 10m on knockoff 40G DACs in production. It's no problem. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:44 AM Randy Bush wrote: > since we're at this layer, should i worry about going 3m with dacs at > low speed, i.e. 10g? may need to do runs to neighbor rack. > > randy >

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Coy Hile said: > I'd expect that from the ToR -> Servers would be MMF, but that other > infrastructure cabling would be SMF. > Even using aftermarket optics, putting single-mode transceivers in > every server and access port would quickly become cost-prohibitive, > would it not?

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Randy Bush
since we're at this layer, should i worry about going 3m with dacs at low speed, i.e. 10g? may need to do runs to neighbor rack. randy

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/20 19:09, Mike Hammett wrote: > When you're buying thousands or tens of thousands, you're also not > shopping off of the FiberStore web site. Not necessarily :-). Mark.

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/20 18:56, Brandon Martin wrote: >   On the fixed side, I have enough trouble convincing folks that APC > and UPC plugs are different On that note, I migrated our network from DC to AC in 2007, and that was a major philosophical drama. At current job, all Transport kit runs DC for hi

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mike Hammett
quot;Mark Tinka" To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 11:05:46 AM Subject: Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions On 26/Feb/20 18:33, Mike Hammett wrote: 1G --- MM $6/ea SM $7/ea 10G --- MM $18/ea SM $24/ea DAC $9.50-$18/pair (length dependent) 25G --

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/20 18:33, Mike Hammett wrote: > 1G > --- > MM $6/ea > SM $7/ea > > 10G > --- > MM $18/ea > SM $24/ea > DAC $9.50-$18/pair (length dependent) > > 25G > --- > MM $39/ea > SM $59/ea > DAC $23-$51/pair (length dependent) > > > > Not a significant price difference from SM to MM, but DAC is e

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/20 18:30, Warren Kumari wrote: > Of course, sometimes you don't have the option of SM - you are > connecting some someone else than they only do MM, or you are > connecting to a piece of kit which doesn't have replaceable optics, or > you have legacy cabling which is MM, or... but, th

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Brandon Martin
On 2/26/20 11:43 AM, Filip Hruska wrote: Some NICs don't support SM optics, so even if you would like to run SM everywhere, it's not necessarily possible depending on the equipment. For example, I had issues with some SolarFlare cards which happily take 10G-SR MM but won't take 10G-LR SM. Is t

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Fearghas Mckay
> On 26 Feb 2020, at 11:33, Mark Tinka wrote: > > I'm certain someone from Flex has NANOG chatter on "Promiscuous Mode" :-). Yes :) f

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Filip Hruska
It really depends on what you're interconnecting. Some NICs don't support SM optics, so even if you would like to run SM everywhere, it's not necessarily possible depending on the equipment. For example, I had issues with some SolarFlare cards which happily take 10G-SR MM but won't take 10G-LR

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mike Hammett
Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Coy Hile" To: "Randy Bush" Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 10:19:37 AM Subject: Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions On 2020-02-26 11:14, Randy Bu

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/20 18:30, Randy Bush wrote: > > i wish flexoptix did 400g DACs. we have two boxes from the same ODM > with interfaces whose sole pupose is to interconnect the two boxes, > and the optics are coded for different vendors. unbelievable. I'm certain someone from Flex has NANOG chatter

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/20 18:19, Coy Hile wrote: > > I'd expect that from the ToR -> Servers would be MMF, but that other > infrastructure cabling would be SMF. I've been designing in-data-centre cabling between routers with MM since 2007. Back then, there was a real material saving in doing that, relegati

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Warren Kumari
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:20 AM Coy Hile wrote: > > On 2020-02-26 11:14, Randy Bush wrote: > >> We use plenty of multi-mode, but only in the data centre, between our > >> own kit, for racks within the same cage. > > > > so you have to stock both single and multi? hmmm > > > > randy > > I'd expec

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Randy Bush
> What is more important to us is that the optics are multi-rate. And > even more important now, is that our 3rd party optics suppliers can > allow us to code and re-code optics to our heart's content. i wish flexoptix did 400g DACs. we have two boxes from the same ODM with interfaces whose sole

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Brandon Martin
On 2/25/20 10:48 PM, Abhi Devireddy wrote: L2 rings IMHO seem pretty brittle. I know there are L2 ring products like Juniper BTI, which use ERPS and not strictly STP/RSTP to move blocking ports, and those seem a little better although it's mostly statically configured. For a strict ring topol

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/20 18:14, Randy Bush wrote: > so you have to stock both single and multi? hmmm Optics are dirt cheap. We don't pay the equipment vendors for their flavour :-). That said, stocking MM and SM is cheaper than stocking just SM, because we can reliably predict when/where we shall use ei

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Coy Hile
On 2020-02-26 11:14, Randy Bush wrote: We use plenty of multi-mode, but only in the data centre, between our own kit, for racks within the same cage. so you have to stock both single and multi? hmmm randy I'd expect that from the ToR -> Servers would be MMF, but that other infrastructure c

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Baldur Norddahl
At the very minimum use bidirectional modules so you will have four channels. That way you would only have 15 switches on a chain. Also be sure to configured your STP weight so the cut will be in the middle. So one fiber will normally be transmitting to 7 switches, the other fiber to the other 8 sw

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Randy Bush
> We use plenty of multi-mode, but only in the data centre, between our > own kit, for racks within the same cage. so you have to stock both single and multi? hmmm randy

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/20 17:43, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > On that note would you gents recommend single-mode or multimode fiber for > buildings? Single-mode, for sure. More predictable characteristics when you climb up the capacity scale, e.g., 10Gbps to 40Gbps to 100Gbps. We use plenty of m

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Baldur Norddahl
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:55 PM wrote: > On that note would you gents recommend single-mode or multimode fiber for > buildings? > > adam > > Single mode fiber for all new installs. There are only few uses cases where multimode still saves a little money (100G optics) but otherwise there are only

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mike Hammett
bruary 26, 2020 9:43:00 AM Subject: RE: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions > Joel Jaeggli > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 4:46 AM > > > There are two fiber pairs running up the building riser. I need to put a > > POE > switch on each floor using this fiber. >

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Feb/20 04:32, Norman Jester wrote: > The idea is to cut the fiber at each floor and insert a switch and daisy > chain the switches together using one pair, and using the other pair as the > failover side of the ring going back to the source so if one device fails it > doesn’t take the

RE: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread adamv0025
> Joel Jaeggli > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 4:46 AM > > > There are two fiber pairs running up the building riser. I need to put a POE > switch on each floor using this fiber. > > You didn’t specify if the existing fiber is single or multi-mode however > On that note would you gents reco

Re: [External] Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Hunter Fuller
If you can go fully dynamically routed, Layer 3 only, this problem becomes much, much easier to solve given the constraints you mention. Among others, Ruckus switches will stack over fiber, but nowhere near 30 units. I think the max is 12 and I would not recommend going over 8. If you need L2, co

RE: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread adamv0025
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 4:46 AM > To: Norman Jester > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Feb 25, 2020, at 18:34, Norman Jester wrote: > > > > I’m in the process of choosing hardware for a 30 story building. If > > anyone has experience with this I’d appreciate any tips. > > > > There

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Abhi Devireddy
be optics at each floor which would give you the full bandwidth at each landing. Hope this helps. I'd be curious if anyone else has ever used DWDM in an intra-building scenario. Thanks, Abhi From: NANOG on behalf of Norman Jester Sent: Tuesday, February

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Kaiser, Erich
XSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------ > *From: *"Ryan Hamel" > *To: *"Bradley Burch" > *Cc: *nanog@nanog.org > *Sent: *Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:45:05 PM > *Subject: *Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions > > How would that work

Re: [EXT] Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Chuck Anderson
Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ryan Hamel" > To: "Bradley Burch" > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:45:05 PM >

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Mike Hammett
quot; To: "Bradley Burch" Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:45:05 PM Subject: Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions How would that work to solve Norman's problem? That sounds like a lot of money spending, and setup time, for nothing. Ryan On Feb 25 2020,

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-26 Thread Bill Woodcock
> On 2/25/20 6:32 PM, Norman Jester wrote: > I’m in the process of choosing hardware > for a 30 story building. If anyone has experience with this I’d appreciate > any tips. > > There are two fiber pairs running up the building riser. I need to put a POE > switch on each floor using this fiber.

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-25 Thread Ryan Hamel
I do not recommend doing that, it's 30 members in a single stack. Mine was only two, directly connected to each other. Treat your control plane like your L2, don't extend it farther than necessary. Ryan On Feb 25 2020, at 9:00 pm, Tim Požár wrote: > > Also, Juniper switches will stack over fiber

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-25 Thread Tim Požár
Also, Juniper switches will stack over fiber. I have deployed Virtual Chassis over multiple IDFs. The VC ports can be (and highly suggested) to be in a ring. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/virtual-chassis-ex4200-overview.html https://www.juniper.net/documentati

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-25 Thread Joel Jaeggli
Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 25, 2020, at 18:34, Norman Jester wrote: > > I’m in the process of choosing hardware > for a 30 story building. If anyone has experience with this I’d appreciate > any tips. > > There are two fiber pairs running up the building riser. I need to put a POE > swi

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-25 Thread Ryan Hamel
How would that work to solve Norman's problem? That sounds like a lot of money spending, and setup time, for nothing. Ryan On Feb 25 2020, at 8:21 pm, Bradley Burch wrote: > > Should consider DWDM or GPON and in those look at passive optical > technologies that can benefit the project. > > On F

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-25 Thread Tim Požár
If you are limited on fiber runs, how about using 10Gb BiDi optics to limit a ring to say two sets of 15 switches. Tim On 2/25/20 8:21 PM, Bradley Burch wrote: > Should consider DWDM or GPON and in those look at passive optical > technologies that can benefit the project. > >> On Feb 25, 2020,

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-25 Thread Ryan Hamel
I'd say a pair of Juniper switches on each floor, with their virtual-chassis capability. Terminate the top/bottom floor of fiber 1 into switch 1, and the other into switch two. Create an LACP bond between each floors switches, tag the necessary VLANs, and put the VLAN SVIs onto the first pair of

Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-25 Thread Bradley Burch
Should consider DWDM or GPON and in those look at passive optical technologies that can benefit the project. > On Feb 25, 2020, at 9:33 PM, Norman Jester wrote: > > I’m in the process of choosing hardware > for a 30 story building. If anyone has experience with this I’d appreciate > any tips.

Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

2020-02-25 Thread Norman Jester
I’m in the process of choosing hardware for a 30 story building. If anyone has experience with this I’d appreciate any tips. There are two fiber pairs running up the building riser. I need to put a POE switch on each floor using this fiber. The idea is to cut the fiber at each floor and insert

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Craig" > But also you have to consider, there are a large degree of shorter term > players, who are in/out of the market and play both sides, these do have > real-time data feeds, and do care about latency. Some shops go as far as to > only use a certain leng

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Joel jaeggli
want the solution. Ask yourself where the incentives are that drive the observed behavior. > > Kiriki Delany > > -Original Message- > From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org] > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:54 AM > To: NANOG > Subject: Re: Hi speed trading -

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Craig
lto:bickn...@ufp.org] > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:54 AM > To: NANOG > Subject: Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring > > In a message written on Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:36:35PM -0500, > valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > Am I the only one who thinks that if net

RE: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Kiriki Delany
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:54 AM To: NANOG Subject: Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring In a message written on Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:36:35PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > Am I the only one who thinks that if network jitter can

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Paul Graydon
On 02/17/2012 08:36 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:01:36 EST, Rodrick Brown said: Trades today in the equity markets must be within the national best bid, best offer price range or companies can be fined by the SEC which is why latency an jitter can be problematic in f

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Leo Bicknell
In a message written on Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:36:35PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > Am I the only one who thinks that if network jitter can make you fall outside > the acceptable price window, maybe, just maybe, the market is just too damned > volatile for its own good? I've had an i

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Valdis Kletnieks" > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:01:36 EST, Rodrick Brown said: > > Trades today in the equity markets must be within the national best > > bid, best > > offer price range or companies can be fined by the SEC which is why > > latency > > an jitter c

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:01:36 EST, Rodrick Brown said: > Trades today in the equity markets must be within the national best bid, best > offer price range or companies can be fined by the SEC which is why latency > an jitter can be problematic in financial networks. Am I the only one who thinks tha

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Rodrick Brown
On Feb 17, 2012, at 10:30 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Paul Graydon" > >> Anecdotally, I had an interview years ago for a small-ish futures >> trading company based in London. The interviewer had to pause the >> interview part way through whilst he investigat

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread John Osmon
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:30:33AM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Paul Graydon" > > > Anecdotally, I had an interview years ago for a small-ish futures > > trading company based in London. The interviewer had to pause the > > interview part way through whilst

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-17 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Paul Graydon" > Anecdotally, I had an interview years ago for a small-ish futures > trading company based in London. The interviewer had to pause the > interview part way through whilst he investigated a 10ms latency spike > that the traders were noticing on

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-16 Thread Paul Graydon
On 2/16/2012 3:03 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/ "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so quickly that human traders can't even react, no fewer than 18,520 c

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-16 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 2/16/12 05:03 , Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire > http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/ > > "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so > quickly that human traders can't even react, no fewer than 18,52

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-16 Thread George Herbert
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Jason Chambers wrote: > On 2/16/12 5:03 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: >> Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire >> http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/ >> >> "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so >>

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-16 Thread Jason Chambers
On 2/16/12 5:03 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire > http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/ > > "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so > quickly that human traders can't even react, no fewer than 18,5

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-16 Thread Christopher J. Pilkington
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:03:55PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Anyone who has managed a network knows that when you look at your > MRTG/Cacti graphs at 5min, 10min ,15min intervals - all looks well. > Start looking at 1sec intervals and you will see spikes that hit > 100% of capacity - even on

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-16 Thread Hank Nussbacher
At 13:49 16/02/2012 +, Jethro R Binks wrote: On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire > http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/ > > "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so > quickly tha

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-16 Thread Jethro R Binks
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire > http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/ > > "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so > quickly that human traders can't even react, no fewer than 1

Re: Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-16 Thread Rodrick Brown
On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire > http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/ > > "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so > quickly that human traders can't even react, no few

Hi speed trading - hi speed monitoring

2012-02-16 Thread Hank Nussbacher
Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/ "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so quickly that human traders can't even react, no fewer than 18,520 crashes and spikes occurred." Anyone who has

Re: hi, a question related to AS 49463

2009-09-06 Thread Laurent CARON
On 06/09/2009 15:56, Bin Dai wrote: Hi: I am interested in ur question to nanog about doubting whether AS 49463 is reachable thourgh AS 12670. in ur case, AS 49463 is multihomed. what you want to do,if i am right, is that you wanna make the following things happen: the 213.215.28.0/23 is

hi

2009-03-21 Thread david gathu
i am getting one volume of the list thats vol 14.i sure bet i am missing some vol's. can you give me a hand on this anyone -- regards DAVID