On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 10:27:33PM +0100, n3td3v wrote:
> He's ruining Nanog, just so he can get self glorification and self
> gratification in
> himself as some kind of leader of internet security industry when he
> really is just a sad fat person who is a nobody.
>
> All the best,
Clearly not.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Patrick Giagnocavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the front page
> of news.com reduces nanog's utility.
>
> --Patrick
>
>
Are you saying that all network professionals should read digg or news.com?
:-)
Btw, s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At least unlike blackworm, this one's damage could be measured.
Actually, BlackWorm was measured -- I have the CAIDA poster in
my cube. :-)
- - ferg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Martin Hannigan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:56 PM, brett watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the front
page of news.com red
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:56 PM, brett watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
>>
>>> Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the front
>>> page of news.com reduces nanog's utility.
>>
>> As d
I feel like I'm on the public blogs with all kinds of idiots giving their
opinion and everything degenerating as each entry is posted. I am only a
lurker on NANOG, just seeking intelligent info for my job. I've been
receiving
these emails for a few years now, but this is ridiculous. Not
e in our community do use this information effectively and find it
>> useful.
>
> Thing is, I had already heard about the facebook worm via my other sources
> of info (and a day earlier); same as anyone else who is paying attention to
> such subjects did.
>
> When info like this
On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the
front page of news.com reduces nanog's utility.
As does the days and days of rehash of one of Gadi's postings.
And all of this BS is even *
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Turning nanog into a rehash of digg's technology section or the front
page of news.com reduces nanog's utility.
As does the days and days of rehash of one of Gadi's postings.
facebook worm via my other
sources of info (and a day earlier); same as anyone else who is paying
attention to such subjects did.
When info like this is spread across multiple lists/sites, the second
and subsequent times it is noise instead of signal.
I lurk on nanog because of what it focuses on
Gadi Evron wrote:
My thinking was that on the rare occasion when we can anticipate
*possible* and *serious* floods and bottle-necks at ISP tech-support
lines, across multiple providers and regions, we should share that
information. NANOG remains the best place for such information sharing.
I
u may want to be ready for a *possible* support lines flood today.
Yesterday I discovered a fast-spreading facebook worm. It spreads by sending
messages to all your facebook friends, from your account, asking them to
click on a link in the .pl ccTLD.
This worm is somewhat similar to zlob, here is a
I promise to put you in your place
once the SC affords me the privlege :)
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all. You may want to be ready for a *possible* support lines flood today.
>
> Yesterday I discovered a fast-spreading facebook wo
Hi all. You may want to be ready for a *possible* support lines flood
today.
Yesterday I discovered a fast-spreading facebook worm. It spreads by
sending messages to all your facebook friends, from your account, asking
them to click on a link in the .pl ccTLD.
This worm is somewhat similar
14 matches
Mail list logo
