> From: Mick O'Rourke
> To: Philip Lavine
> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:48 PM
> Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
>
>
> As in
> - use of multi or single AS?
> - private
dedicated link b/w colo and hq (I don't like allow-as in! but
it is another option)
./Randy
--- On Thu, 6/14/12, Philip Lavine wrote:
> From: Philip Lavine
> Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
> To: "Mick O'Rourke"
> Cc: "nan
hilip Lavine
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
As in
- use of multi or single AS?
- private, vpn or other dci?
- etc
What's the purpose of the site? Or what end result are you trying to
Does this include Multi Site + Multi Homed
From: Chad Gietzen
To: Philip Lavine
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
I found the following helpful, pr
I found the following helpful, presented by Philip Smith at NANOG 41
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog41/presentations/BGPMultihoming.pdf
Chad
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Philip Lavine wrote:
> Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming
> accross two phyi
Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming
accross two phyiscally seperated sites.
6 matches
Mail list logo
