On 1/Aug/15 18:34, marco da pieve wrote:
> Hi Shane,
> for the boxes that are currently installed in the network, this is not a
> valid option (politically/commercially speaking).
Well, Cisco, Juniper and ALU are shipping carrier-grade OS's that will
run on a server in a VM.
Brocade is also kno
On 1/Aug/15 17:38, marco da pieve wrote:
> Hi all,
> this is my first time in asking for advices here and I hope not to bother
> you with this topic (if it has been already covered in the past, would you
> please please point me to that discussion?).
>
> Anyway, I need to decide whether to go for
Hi all,
I'm sorry about this email replication (or spam whatever you like most) but
one of the replies to my original email could have made this email
unnoticed.
This is my first time in asking for advices here and I hope not to bother
you with this topic (if it has been already covered in the past
Hi Shane,
for the boxes that are currently installed in the network, this is not a
valid option (politically/commercially speaking).
thanks,
Marco
On 1 August 2015 at 18:16, Shane Ronan wrote:
> Have you considered a virtual route reflector rather than physical
> hardware?
> On Aug 1, 2015 11:3
Have you considered a virtual route reflector rather than physical hardware?
On Aug 1, 2015 11:39 AM, "marco da pieve" wrote:
> Hi all,
> this is my first time in asking for advices here and I hope not to bother
> you with this topic (if it has been already covered in the past, would you
> please
Hi all,
this is my first time in asking for advices here and I hope not to bother
you with this topic (if it has been already covered in the past, would you
please please point me to that discussion?).
Anyway, I need to decide whether to go for a BGP topology with a single
cluster of 3 Route Refle
6 matches
Mail list logo
