On 6 Jan 2012, at 07:33, "Måns Nilsson" wrote:
>
> Thanks all who made me think a second round and solve this.
Hence why people prefer to ask people and not GOOG et-al.
--
Leigh Porter
__
This email has been scanned by th
Subject: Re: anycast load balancing issue Date: Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:12:33PM
+0100 Quoting Johannes Resch (j...@xor.at):
> >Any clues?
> Since you mention route-reflector route selection - are you already
> using per-VRF, per-PE route distinguishers for that L3VPN instance?
Pr
Hi,
On 04.01.2012 13:02, Måns Nilsson wrote:
> [..snipped..]
>
Trouble is, we find that (untweaked) cost and metric are such that all
nodes are equal. The last resort (peer router ID) gets invoked and all
traffic goes to one single instance. Of course, when that instance falls
off the net rec
On Jan 4, 2012 4:52 AM, "Måns Nilsson" wrote:
>
> Subject: anycast load balancing issue Date: Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at
01:02:55PM +0100 Quoting Måns Nilsson (mansa...@besserwisser.org):
>
> > Trouble is, we find that (untweaked) cost and metric are such that all
> > n
Subject: anycast load balancing issue Date: Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:02:55PM
+0100 Quoting Måns Nilsson (mansa...@besserwisser.org):
> Trouble is, we find that (untweaked) cost and metric are such that all
> nodes are equal.
s/all nodes/all nodes in my pathetically small test case/
Hi,
I'm in the process of deploying an anycast DNS service internally. We're
on a pretty provider-like network, where we run MPLS to provide several
network overlays for different services. iBGP is used to distribute
routing information, and ISIS is used as IGP. In one of the VRFen we
would like
6 matches
Mail list logo