> On Aug 10, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Wayne E Bouchard wrote:
>
> ASNumber: 701 - 705
> ASName: UUNET
> ASHandle: AS701
> RegDate:1990-08-03
> Updated:2012-03-20
> Ref:http://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS701
>
> Although not having been updated yet makes it
ASNumber: 701 - 705
ASName: UUNET
ASHandle: AS701
RegDate:1990-08-03
Updated:2012-03-20
Ref:http://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS701
Although not having been updated yet makes it one of the older
registry entries, having just passed 25 years..
On Mon, A
UUNet would have been 40% funnier. (I rounded up from 39.975%)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> > On Aug 10, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Blair Trosper
> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone know why Zayo still hasn't renamed the BGP AS network names for
> all
> > the AboveNet ASNs?
>
> They do
> On Aug 10, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Blair Trosper wrote:
>
> Anyone know why Zayo still hasn't renamed the BGP AS network names for all
> the AboveNet ASNs?
They don’t want to disrupt their Alternet peering sessions.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message sig
Anyone know why Zayo still hasn't renamed the BGP AS network names for all
the AboveNet ASNs?
Not to poke fun at Global Crossing, but they changed Level 3's AS name in
less time (which, if I recall, took over a year to happen...)
I don't see Zayo using the Above.net brand anywhere lately...honest
We're looking at some emergency office space in Manhattan and we identified
an AboveNet/Zayo fiber panel in the space. Would like to see if someone
could confirm if it is viable.
Anyone from Abovenet lurking?
Thanks,
-cjp
6 matches
Mail list logo
