On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> That is congruent with my understanding of how cableco voice is
> provisioned;
> it has different rules WRT VoN -- specifically about 911 -- because the
> cable
> company segregates it and handles it differently (your cablemodem is
> expec
- Original Message -
> From: "Luke Guillory"
> To: "jra"
> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group"
> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 10:18:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Voice channels (FTTH, DOCSIS, VoLTE)
> With MGCP we'r
ezei"
mailto:jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca>>
Cc: Nanog@nanog.org<mailto:Nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 2:53:41 AM
Subject: Re: Voice channels (FTTH, DOCSIS, VoLTE)
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
I need to verify some claims made by incumbents in Ca
- Original Message -
> From: "Mikael Abrahamsson"
> To: "Jean-Francois Mezei"
> Cc: Nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 2:53:41 AM
> Subject: Re: Voice channels (FTTH, DOCSIS, VoLTE)
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
&
On 2016-11-21 21:56, joel jaeggli wrote:
> Not really the air interface uses OFDMA coding scheme, so it is both
> divided into sub-carriers from 1.4 to 20mhz wide which are then also
> scheduled accordingly.
I have read in a number of places that 1 * 20mhz yields much more
capacity than 2 * 10mhz
On 11/21/16 3:12 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
> On 2016-11-21 15:18, joel jaeggli wrote:
>
>
>> SRB and URB are the l2 presentation of the tunnels established for user
>> and signaling traffic.
> OK, so wth LTE, if carrier has 10mhz up and down, this represents a
> single chunk of spectrum provid
On 2016-11-21 15:18, joel jaeggli wrote:
> SRB and URB are the l2 presentation of the tunnels established for user
> and signaling traffic.
OK, so wth LTE, if carrier has 10mhz up and down, this represents a
single chunk of spectrum providing one pipe ? (in fibre terms: a single
light colour thr
On 11/21/16 11:13 AM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
> On 2016-11-21 02:53, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> Typically it travels on another "bearer" compared to Internet traffic.
>>
>> http://blog.3g4g.co.uk/2013/08/volte-bearers.html
>>
>> Think of bearers as "tunnels" between the mobile core network a
On 2016-11-21 02:53, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> Typically it travels on another "bearer" compared to Internet traffic.
>
> http://blog.3g4g.co.uk/2013/08/volte-bearers.html
>
> Think of bearers as "tunnels" between the mobile core network and the
> device.
Many thanks for the pointer. The fa
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
I need to verify some claims made by incumbents in Canada that VoLTE
data travels on a totally separate channel between the phone and the
antenna.
Typically it travels on another "bearer" compared to Internet traffic.
http://blog.3g4g.co.uk/2013
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
> Would DOCSIS be the same as FTTH, with the cableco voice service riding
> isnide the same DOCSIS bandwidth but with pre-allocated bandwidth, or do
> they allocate separate NTSC channels with a totally separate data pipe ?
DOCSIS has a possibility
I need to verify some claims made by incumbents in Canada that VoLTE
data travels on a totally separate channel between the phone and the
antenna.
Does anyone have links to relevant VoLTE documentation that would
provide how VoLTE is provisioned ? I was under the impression that it
was more of an
12 matches
Mail list logo
