Verizon Wireless has been pushing their clients away from static IPv4 for some
time. I inquired last year about getting one for a specific project and was
told it would be a large upfront cost, limited to certain accounts and required
justification.
I imagine in the years coming this will beco
On 08/03/2017, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Seems to me that the only people who get static, wireless, IP addresses
> are people who put sensors on vehicles and IoT applications. Who gets a
> static IP for a phone? This might cause some serious heartburn for my
> previous employer - who built CAD sys
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 22:08:59 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
> > > previous employer - who built CAD systems for transit buses.
> > on the bright side they can just get fios or dsl (depending on location)
> ..
> > you know you can still get v4 there, and
On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 22:08:59 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
> > previous employer - who built CAD systems for transit buses.
> on the bright side they can just get fios or dsl (depending on location) ..
> you know you can still get v4 there, and won't even have to worry about
> that pesky new fang
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:10 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Miles Fidelman >
> wrote:
>
> > Seems to me that the only people who get static, wireless, IP addresses
> > are people who put sensors on vehicles and IoT applications. Who gets a
> > static IP for a phon
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Seems to me that the only people who get static, wireless, IP addresses
> are people who put sensors on vehicles and IoT applications. Who gets a
> static IP for a phone? This might cause some serious heartburn for my
> previous employer -
Seems to me that the only people who get static, wireless, IP addresses
are people who put sensors on vehicles and IoT applications. Who gets a
static IP for a phone? This might cause some serious heartburn for my
previous employer - who built CAD systems for transit buses.
Miles Fidelman
My customer got the email and the only service they have is wireless. Also
notice the email address.
From: Verizon Wireless
mailto:verizonwirele...@email.vzwshop.com>>
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 8, 2017, at 6:44 PM, Keith Stokes
mailto:kei...@neilltech.com>> wrote:
You said the e-mail was f
You said the e-mail was from VZ wireless but the e-mail text says Verizon. Is
it really all of Verizon, VZ Wireless, home, business or some combination?
On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:16 AM, David Hubbard
mailto:dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com>> wrote:
Thought the list would find this interesting. Just r
I'm assuming no consideration for using RFC-6598 addresses (100.64.0.0/10)
and performing CGN as a bridge, perhaps via LW4o6
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM Randy Carpenter
wrote:
>
> It would have been nice if Verizon had starting issuing IPv6 while still
> issuing IPv4 for an easy transition.
It would have been nice if Verizon had starting issuing IPv6 while still
issuing IPv4 for an easy transition. The current situation is that you can't
get static IPv6 at all. I have been bugging them about this for many years.
thanks,
-Randy
- On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:16 PM, David Hubbard dhu
Thought the list would find this interesting. Just received an email from VZ
wireless that they’re going to stop selling static IPv4 for wireless
subscribers in June. That should make for some interesting support calls on
the broadband/fios side; one half of the company is forcing ipv6, the ot
12 matches
Mail list logo
