Re: Verizon MPLS service in Anchorage

2011-02-24 Thread lists lists
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Brandon Ross wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, lists lists wrote: > > I'm seeing that packets marked as DSCP EF are given fantastic treatment >> (low >> jitter, no packet loss), but other packets, including AF41, AF31, and BE >> are >> given what appears to be the "

Re: Verizon MPLS service in Anchorage

2011-02-24 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Brandon Ross wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, lists lists wrote: > >> I'm seeing that packets marked as DSCP EF are given fantastic treatment >> (low >> jitter, no packet loss), but other packets, including AF41, AF31, and BE >> are >> given what appears to be the "j

Re: Verizon MPLS service in Anchorage

2011-02-24 Thread Brandon Ross
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, lists lists wrote: I'm seeing that packets marked as DSCP EF are given fantastic treatment (low jitter, no packet loss), but other packets, including AF41, AF31, and BE are given what appears to be the "junk bucket" treatment. Hah, just a few days ago I spoke with an "engi

Verizon MPLS service in Anchorage

2011-02-24 Thread lists lists
Hello, I've got a bunch of sites connected to the Verizon Private IP MPLS service, and recently brought online a location in Anchorage connected to the brand-new PE node in the same city. I'm seeing that packets marked as DSCP EF are given fantastic treatment (low jitter, no packet loss), but oth