Re: Updated prefix filtering

In message , Dave Taht writes: > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Chaim Rieger wrote= > : > > > > Best example I=E2=80=99ve found is located at http://jonsblog.lewis.org/= > > > > > I too ran out of space, Brocade, not Cisco though, and am looking to filt= > er pref

Re: Updated prefix filtering

Hello Dave, On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > I have had a piece long on the spike on how we implemented bcp38 for > linux (openwrt) devices using the ipset facility. > > We had a different use case (preventing all possible internal rfc1918 > network addresses from escaping, whi

Re: Updated prefix filtering

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Chaim Rieger wrote: > > Best example I’ve found is located at http://jonsblog.lewis.org/ > > > I too ran out of space, Brocade, not Cisco though, and am looking to filter > prefixes. did anybody do a more recent or updated filter list

Re: Updated prefix filtering

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > Not sure if you missed it.. there was a discussion on this topic in the > recent past... > I am taking the liberty of re-posting below.. you may find it useful. You can find the complete thread here: http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/

Re: Updated prefix filtering

Rieger" > To: "NANOG list" > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 6:41:34 PM > Subject: Updated prefix filtering > > > Best example I’ve found is located at http://jonsblog.lewis.org/ > <http://jonsblog.lewis.org/> > > I too ran out of space, Brocade, n

Updated prefix filtering

Best example I’ve found is located at http://jonsblog.lewis.org/ I too ran out of space, Brocade, not Cisco though, and am looking to filter prefixes. did anybody do a more recent or updated filter list since 2008 ? Offlist is fine. Oh and happy friday to all.