On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:22:59PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> >
> http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/159964/20110609/nasa-solar-flare-tsunami-earth-sun-radio-satellite-interference-aurora-displays-coronal-mass-ejectio.htm
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:22:59PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/159964/20110609/nasa-solar-flare-tsunami-earth-sun-radio-satellite-interference-aurora-displays-coronal-mass-ejectio.htm
Someone should tell the IB Times that "Tsunami" doesn't
On Jun 10, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/159964/20110609/nasa-solar-flare-tsunami-earth-sun-radio-satellite-interference-aurora-displays-coronal-mass-ejectio.htm
>
> -Hank
>
>
If you are interested in the actual event, watch the A
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/159964/20110609/nasa-solar-flare-tsunami-earth-sun-radio-satellite-interference-aurora-displays-coronal-mass-ejectio.htm
-Hank
The warning was released at 3:55PM in GMT,
but local news says several number of people is injured again.
Masato
> -Original Message-
> From: andrew.wallace [mailto:andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 8:14 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject:
A tsunami warning is issued for north-eastern Japan after an earthquake with a
magnitude of 7.4 hits the region.
Andrew
to take
into account. Tsunami's rarely become towering breaking waves.
Quite right. The other part is that the water becomes a very fast moving
river, especially in places where it's not normally one. Watching the
I don't underestimate the power of even a small tsunami. I have frie
face are nominal, and off
> shore platforms are (generally) built with these things in mind:
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27324535/ns/technology_and_science-innovatio
> n/
>> Here is a video of the recent Japanese tsunami from a JCG ship in the
> the open ocean. The waves (@ ~4:20 and 6
surface are nominal, and off
>>> shore platforms are (generally) built with these things in mind:
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27324535/ns/technology_and_science-innovation/
>>>
>>
>> Here is a video of the recent Japanese tsunami from a JCG ship in the the
&
7324535/ns/technology_and_science-innovatio
n/
>>
>
> Here is a video of the recent Japanese tsunami from a JCG ship in the
the open ocean. The waves (@ ~4:20 and 6:40 into the video) caused them
no trouble, but they were certainly not imperceptible.
>
With the video :
http://www.y
.msnbc.msn.com/id/27324535/ns/technology_and_science-innovation/
>>
>
> Here is a video of the recent Japanese tsunami from a JCG ship in the the
> open ocean. The waves (@ ~4:20 and 6:40 into the video) caused them no
> trouble, but they were certainly not imperceptible.
ocean, these things are pretty imperceptible.
> The effect on ships on the surface are nominal, and off shore platforms are
> (generally) built with these things in mind:
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27324535/ns/technology_and_science-innovation/
>
Here is a video of the recent Japane
nd off shore platforms are
(generally) built with these things in mind:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27324535/ns/technology_and_science-innovation/
At the other extreme, Lituya Bay is a good example of a Mega Tsunami (1,720
feet):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Lituya_Bay_megatsunami
ct that all of a sudden you had a 5-10 knot current.
And this happened at low tide, so it would have been far worse if it happened
at high tide. There was a pretty spectacular photo of the tsunami that
appeared to be around the Emeryville flats. Only about 6 or so inches high,
but massive. Had
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Gavin Pearce wrote:
>> travels in general at approx 970 kph (600 mph)
>
> True in the deepest parts of open ocean - upon reaching the shore-line
> it'll be travelling a lot slower.
You guys forget a lot of folks on the list are working on cabling ships and off
s
come towering breaking waves.
[That said, tsunamis can form into a bore - a step-like wave with a
steep breaking front. Likely if the tsunami moves from deep water into a
shallow river / bay]
1 1/2 foot on top of an existing high tide, could easily cause further
flooding in the wrong locations (a
ar 28, 2011 at 1:59 AM, wrote:
>> > *yawn*. A foot and a half isn't going to be all *that* bad
>>
>> Remember a wall of tsunami water travels in general at approx 970 kph
>>(600
>> mph), think about it.
>>
>
>That's in deep water, where the he
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:28 PM, andrew.wallace <
andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:59 AM, wrote:
> > *yawn*. A foot and a half isn't going to be all *that* bad
>
> Remember a wall of tsunami water travels in general at approx 970 kph (
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:59 AM, wrote:
> *yawn*. A foot and a half isn't going to be all *that* bad
Remember a wall of tsunami water travels in general at approx 970 kph (600
mph), think about it.
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:46:24 PDT, "andrew.wallace" said:
> More information from http://www.jma.go.jp/en/tsunami/
Has expired already, but only predicted a 0.5 meter crest.
http://www.jma.go.jp/en/tsunami/info_04_20110328072748.html
*yawn*. A foot and a half isn't going to
More information from http://www.jma.go.jp/en/tsunami/
Andrew
--- jeffshu...@wvi.com wrote:
Last time I checked, Pipeline was on the north side of the island, was
it not? Activity coming from Chile would be on the east and southern sides.
--
Wrap around. The tsunami sirens were going off, folks were getting to high
The tsunami center has cancelled the warnings for Hawaii (so I just heard from
fox news). I guess it's really nothing, now. Who knows with how many aftershocks
might be generated from that 8.8 EQ.
-S
Jeff Shultz wrote:
> On 2/27/2010 3:36 PM, Scott Wee
On 2/27/2010 3:36 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
---
It wasn't anything. Stood on the cliff above Pipeline (famous surf spot) and
couldn't tell if the water washing up the beach was normal winter surf or a
tsunami. Other parts of the island may have seen mo
-
> The Tsunami is big enough to be dangerous but seems not to be too major :
--
It wasn't anything. Stood on the cliff above Pipeline (famous surf spot) and
couldn't tell if the water washing up the beach was
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
The Tsunami is big enough to be dangerous but seems not to be too major :
It depends on where you are located, not just how distant you are from
Chili but also the angle. They are forecasting a cone-shaped zone of
effect heading directly towards Hawaii. See:
http
The Tsunami is big enough to be dangerous but seems not to be too
major :
http://www.prh.noaa.gov/ptwc/messages/pacific/2010/pacific.2010.02.27.202736.txt
LOTTIN PT NZ 37.6S 178.2E 1934Z 0.15M / 0.5FT 10MIN
CABO SAN LUCAS MX 22.9N 109.9W 1833Z 0.36M / 1.2FT 12MIN
ACAPULCO MX 16.8N 99.9W 1549Z
, Antonio Querubin wrote:
Tsunami evacuation zone areas are being advised to evacuate. But
of
course the online maps are actually offline today for some reason.
I'd guess HI civil defence would not mind some quick assistance by
a CDN..
The telephone book versions are online though.
FYI
For anyone interested in live tv coverage
http://www.weatherserver.net/earthquake/They are windows media feeds
from Hawaii TV stations.
On 2/27/2010 12:52 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Kauto Huopio wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/10 8:08 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
>>
>>> Tsunami evacuation zone areas are being advised to evacuate. But of
>>> course the online maps are actually offl
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Kauto Huopio wrote:
On 2/27/10 8:08 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
Tsunami evacuation zone areas are being advised to evacuate. But of
course the online maps are actually offline today for some reason.
I'd guess HI civil defence would not mind some quick assistance
On 2/27/10 8:08 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> Tsunami evacuation zone areas are being advised to evacuate. But of
> course the online maps are actually offline today for some reason.
I'd guess HI civil defence would not mind some quick assistance by a CDN..
--Kauto
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Jason L wrote:
6:01am HST (11:01am EDT) Evac sirens sounded across the Hawaii Islands and
the wave is expected at 11:05am HST (4:05pm EDT) this is updated as it was
11:19am before.
Tsunami evacuation zone areas are being advised to evacuate. But of
course the online
6:01am HST (11:01am EDT) Evac sirens sounded across the Hawaii Islands
and the wave is expected at 11:05am HST (4:05pm EDT) this is updated as
it was 11:19am before.
Al Gore was fake, the Chilean Earthquakes are real.
If you have interests near the Pacific Ocean, read up on the Tsunami
warnings for the area of your interest.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9E4DMIG0&show_article=1
--
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is b
35 matches
Mail list logo
