Huh?
I’m saying they are network identifiers and not something else (like POP names,
or geographical indexes,
or inventory control numbers, or crypto currency or whatever else).
So I’m not sure I understand your point here.
Owen
> On Jan 2, 2018, at 15:58 , William Herrin wrote:
>
> On Tue,
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I agree we all have a responsibility to hold the line on addresses being
> network identifiers
Hi Owen,
The delicious irony here is that EUI-64 supporting SLAAC is exactly that:
an identifier. If we hold the line there, there is no line.
Re
I agree we all have a responsibility to hold the line on addresses being
network identifiers and to some extent network locators (unfortunately). I
agree we have a responsibility to sparsely and liberally allocate within reason
(where /8 to ITU isn’t within reason, but a /12 might be, and even i
On January 1, 2018 at 22:09 trel...@trelane.net (Andrew Kirch) wrote:
> Lets say the worst case scenario is that we exhaust IPv6 at a rate
> MASSIVELY higher than planned. Can't we all just do this again in like 80
> years? I don't get why anyone cares so much that this thread won't die.
>
Lets say the worst case scenario is that we exhaust IPv6 at a rate
MASSIVELY higher than planned. Can't we all just do this again in like 80
years? I don't get why anyone cares so much that this thread won't die.
Speaking of dying, I'll be dead by then anyway.
Andrew
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 11
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 13:36:32 +0900, Randy Bush said:
> thomas watson: i think there is a world market for maybe five computers
"The Yale Book of Quotations quotes an I.B.M. source that this '... is a
misunderstanding of remarks made at I.B.M.'s annual stockholders meeting on
April 28, 1953. In re
> If anyone wants to TL;DR
moe: 2^128 is effectively infinita
larry: we thought 2^32 was effectively infinite
curly: we'll never need more than 640k
thomas watson: i think there is a world market for maybe five computers
I haven't even ... This thread's going to turn into another thread that
never ends.
On 30/12/2017 15:39, sizone!math wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 06:42:46AM -0800, Stephen Satchell said:
> On 12/29/2017 09:05 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >the good thing about these long threads, which have Z
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 06:42:46AM -0800, Stephen Satchell said:
> On 12/29/2017 09:05 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >the good thing about these long threads, which have ZERO new
> >information, is having a KillThread command in one's mail user agent.
> >get a life!
>
>I no longer use KillThr
On 12/29/2017 09:05 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
the good thing about these long threads, which have ZERO new
information, is having a KillThread command in one's mail user agent.
get a life!
I no longer use KillThread. Instead, I sort my inbox by subject, and
use the Delete key liberally. NANOG is
10 matches
Mail list logo
