Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

On 16/06/2020 22:08, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: This issue was raised in Reddit and Github: https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/h149em/calls_to_replace_blacklist_whitelist_black_hat/ https://www.techspot.com/news/85631-github-replace-terms-whi

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

If we want to go down that rabbit trail, then aren’t we talking about Reputation lists? On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:44 PM Harald Koch wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, at 15:08, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: > > blacklists are not always deny/block/disallow and conformed of things that > allow you t

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

8FAC D6A0 8001 2869 BD52 From: NANOG on behalf of J. Hellenthal via NANOG Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 12:08 PM To: Ryan Landry Cc: NANOG; Rachee Singh Subject: Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation Guess we all better start rewriting

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

J. Hellenthal, thank you for your reply. I am not in marketing. I represent a team of talented network engineers, some of which are persons of color and under-represented minorities. I believe we, as a community, can do better to effect change, and hold each other accountable to this end. It is a

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, at 15:08, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: > blacklists are not always deny/block/disallow and conformed of things that > allow you to take actions whatever your choosing upon their contents and your > policies. > > What’s next ? redlisting ? Don’t offend the Russians ... blu

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

Guess we all better start rewriting all of the documentation out there because some PC marketing snowflake wants to get extra brownie points and attention for classifying a color in RGB into a racial divide for which it never originated. blacklists are not always deny/block/disallow and conforme

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

Yo Rachee! On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:59:17 -0700 Rachee Singh wrote: > PS: as someone correctly pointed out, the more appropriate > terminology is "IP blocklists". Google says that descriminates against the Eastern Block of the EU. RGDS GARY ---

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

mp; Teaching Security Operations Center (ORTSOC) > Phone: 541.737.7723 > GPG Fingerprint: ECC5 03A6 7E91 17C6 50C6 8FAC D6A0 8001 2869 BD52 > > > From: NANOG on behalf of Rachee Singh < > rachee.si...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

03A6 7E91 17C6 50C6 8FAC D6A0 8001 2869 BD52 From: NANOG on behalf of Rachee Singh Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 9:15 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation Hi NANOG community, We are a group of researc

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

In kind, I'd like to encourage the use of terms like permit/accept list or deny/block list. Respectfully, -Ryan On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:33 AM Rachee Singh wrote: > Hi NANOG community, > > We are a group of researchers studying the use of IP blacklists as a > mechanism to mitigate security th

Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

Hi NANOG community, We are a group of researchers studying the use of IP blacklists as a mechanism to mitigate security threats -- particularly over the IPv6 Internet. We would like to understand if and how you use IP blacklists to secure your networks. Please consider taking our short survey: htt