-
From: b...@theworld.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2019 3:18:42 PM
Subject: Re: Spamming of NANOG list members
WARNING: I AM ABOUT TO PONTIFICATE!
Many of the lists etc I'm on get spamt and that's followed by a stream
of "we're getting spamt!" (eit
WARNING: I AM ABOUT TO PONTIFICATE!
Many of the lists etc I'm on get spamt and that's followed by a stream
of "we're getting spamt!" (either directly or scraped) agonizing, over
and over.
I've been involved in the spam problems since before some of you were
bornt (ok I'll stop with the stupid p
See this as well today
But gmail auto trashed it :)
Col
> On 1 Jun 2019, at 14:50, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
> * s...@ottie.org (Scott Christopher) [Sat 01 Jun 2019, 12:04 CEST]:
>> I wonder if this crap corresponds positively with the price of Bitcoin.
>
> Only speculation (read: market manipul
* s...@ottie.org (Scott Christopher) [Sat 01 Jun 2019, 12:04 CEST]:
I wonder if this crap corresponds positively with the price of Bitcoin.
Only speculation (read: market manipulation) by holders of massive
amounts of bitcoin drives the price of cryptocurrencies:
https://davidgerard.co.uk/blo
M. Omer GOLGELI wrote:
> There are also variants of it with subjects like
>
> " Ref Id: %VARIABLE% "
> and
> "%Domain.tld% Ref Id: %VARIABLE% "
>
>
>
> And as Bryan said, we are increasingly getting more and more as well.
I wonder if this crap corresponds positively with the price of Bitcoin
There are also variants of it with subjects like
" Ref Id: %VARIABLE% "
and
"%Domain.tld% Ref Id: %VARIABLE% "
And as Bryan said, we are increasingly getting more and more as well.
M. Omer GOLGELI
---
AS202365
June 1, 2019 6:05 AM, "Richard" mailto:rgolod...@infratection.com?to=%22Richard%22%20)>
On 5/31/19 5:53 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote:
Anybody else noticed a significant uptick in these e-mails?
When I first saw this thread, I hadn't seen any. A couple days later, I
got my first one. (yay!) Now I'm getting 2-3 a day. (yay?)
Intriguing.
I've not yet received a single one.
--
Grant
On 5/31/2019 8:05 PM, Richard wrote:
> On 5/31/19 8:07 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
>> * br...@shout.net (Bryan Holloway) [Sat 01 Jun 2019, 01:54 CEST]:
>>> Anybody else noticed a significant uptick in these e-mails?
>>>
>>> When I first saw this thread, I hadn't seen any. A couple days later,
>>> I go
On 5/31/19 8:07 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
> * br...@shout.net (Bryan Holloway) [Sat 01 Jun 2019, 01:54 CEST]:
>> Anybody else noticed a significant uptick in these e-mails?
>>
>> When I first saw this thread, I hadn't seen any. A couple days later,
>> I got my first one. (yay!) Now I'm getting 2-3 a
* br...@shout.net (Bryan Holloway) [Sat 01 Jun 2019, 01:54 CEST]:
Anybody else noticed a significant uptick in these e-mails?
When I first saw this thread, I hadn't seen any. A couple days
later, I got my first one. (yay!) Now I'm getting 2-3 a day. (yay?)
Yes. It's pretty annoying. And som
Anybody else noticed a significant uptick in these e-mails?
When I first saw this thread, I hadn't seen any. A couple days later, I
got my first one. (yay!) Now I'm getting 2-3 a day. (yay?)
On Wed, 29 May 2019, Paul Ferguson wrote:
AS | IP | AS Name
14061 | 68.183.65[.]234| DIGITALOCEAN-ASN - DigitalOcean, LLC, US (shared
hosting)
16276 | 158.69.127[.]22| OVH, FR (shared hosting)
51167 | 173.249.2[.]31 | CONTABO, DE (shared hosting)
46475 | 74
> On May 29, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
> * fergdawgs...@mykolab.com (Paul Ferguson) [Wed 29 May 2019, 18:04 CEST]:
>> This is apparently (?) part of a wave of spoofed malspams impersonating
>> messages with ‘weaponized' attachments sent to the NANOG (North American
>> Network Op
* fergdawgs...@mykolab.com (Paul Ferguson) [Wed 29 May 2019, 18:04 CEST]:
This is apparently (?) part of a wave of spoofed malspams
impersonating messages with ‘weaponized' attachments sent to the
NANOG (North American Network Operators Group) mailing list.
They're not sent to the list, they'r
*Just an FYI, the obfuscated URLs and IPs below are malicious.*
This is apparently (?) part of a wave of spoofed malspams impersonating
messages with ‘weaponized' attachments sent to the NANOG (North American
Network Operators Group) mailing list. Background:
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail
On 5/24/19 4:11 PM, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
I guess you don’t get Comcast abuse reports, below is an example:
"e7f05f85ba44ad3393e7b086eed202ee b2cca3a3ae3825c36999e12722e83830"
,
"Ed d95a762f93c99703afe76d25f1679ea4"
Those look like they are probably MD5 hashes (I'm guessing) of names.
So y
Rich,
Comment’s inline:
On May 24, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 06:34:25PM +0300, Scott Christopher wrote:
>> https://marc.info/?l=nanog&r=1&w=2 and https://lists.gt.net/nanog/
>> mangle email addresses in the headers but do nothing about email addresses
>> tha
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 06:34:25PM +0300, Scott Christopher wrote:
> https://marc.info/?l=nanog&r=1&w=2 and https://lists.gt.net/nanog/
> mangle email addresses in the headers but do nothing about email addresses
> that are quoted / attributed in the body.
There is zero, as in 0.0, point in mangl
I just got one of these and have not posted in a long time. They must be
crawling archives.
An interesting development: my posting to this list a few minutes
ago seems to have triggered an autoresponder asking me to confirm
the issuance of a support ticket by Liquid Web, whoever they are.
- Brian
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
> > > Anne, the w
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
> > Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of
> > the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply
> > records the addresses of persons posting to the list. They the
On 5/24/19 11:36 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of
the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply
records the addresses of persons posting to the list.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
> Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of
> the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply
> records the addresses of persons posting to the list. They then
> get spammed.
I rather susp
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
> Question: Is the member list with email addresses public?? Otherwise,
> one has to wonder how they got these addresses?
https://marc.info/?l=nanog&r=1&w=2 and https://lists.gt.net/nanog/ mangle email
addresses in the headers but do nothing about email addresse
ssage -
From: "William Herrin"
To: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq."
Cc: "J. Hellenthal via NANOG"
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 10:14:47 AM
Subject: Re: Spamming of NANOG list members
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:08 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. < amitch...@isipp.com >
Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of
the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply
records the addresses of persons posting to the list. They then
get spammed.
- Brian
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:07:28AM -0600, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. w
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:08 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
wrote:
> Question: Is the member list with email addresses public?? Otherwise,
> one has to wonder how they got these addresses?
>
Everyone who posts does so with an email address that becomes known to
everyone who subscribes and published
Question: Is the member list with email addresses public?? Otherwise, one has
to wonder how they got these addresses?
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
Author: Section 6 of the C
So sheer coincidence. Literally.
—Sandy
> On May 23, 2019, at 7:07 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
> * sa...@tislabs.com (Sandra Murphy) [Fri 24 May 2019, 00:28 CEST]:
>> And it arrived oddly coincident with my visit to the cvent registration
>> page. Any others who had that coincidence?
>
> No,
* sa...@tislabs.com (Sandra Murphy) [Fri 24 May 2019, 00:28 CEST]:
And it arrived oddly coincident with my visit to the cvent
registration page. Any others who had that coincidence?
No, and I've gotten like five by now.
-- Niels.
Mine came 21 May. It was a .doc.
Sent from charter.net, with the user portion of the sender very similar to a
nanog contributor.
And it arrived oddly coincident with my visit to the cvent registration page.
Any others who had that coincidence?
—Sandy
> On May 23, 2019, at 5:39 PM, Richar
On 5/23/19 4:16 PM, Matt Harris wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:13 PM Hansen, Christoffer
> mailto:christof...@netravnen.de>> wrote:
>
> Appreciate the warning!
>
> On 23/05/2019 19:46, Valerie Wittkop wrote:
> > These messages are not flowing through NANOG servers, nor using
> t
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:13 PM Hansen, Christoffer <
christof...@netravnen.de> wrote:
> Appreciate the warning!
>
> On 23/05/2019 19:46, Valerie Wittkop wrote:
> > These messages are not flowing through NANOG servers, nor using the
> NANOG domain. They are not messages coming from the NANOG organ
Appreciate the warning!
On 23/05/2019 19:46, Valerie Wittkop wrote:
> These messages are not flowing through NANOG servers, nor using the NANOG
> domain. They are not messages coming from the NANOG organization. Please be
> aware if you receive a message matching this description and always make
Hello NANOG Community,
It has come to our attention there are spamming messages being sent to members
of the NANOG mail list spoofed to look as though they are coming from the NANOG
organization. The messages being sent refer to NANOG Remittance, with an
attachment containing a virus.
These m
35 matches
Mail list logo
