Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities

2011-10-11 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Tom Lanyon wrote on 11/10/2011 01:42: In the case that there is both iBGP and IGP running internally, is there any reason to choose one or the other to originate a default route to our aggregation/access layers? At some point I imagine it's going to be redistributed into the IGP (or re-orig

Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities

2011-10-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Keegan Holley wrote: > > > 2011/10/11 Christopher Morrow >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Keegan Holley >> wrote: >> > The definition of clean is also subjective.  There are many who would >> > run >> > the IGP only for loopbacks and /30's and force everyth

Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities

2011-10-10 Thread Keegan Holley
2011/10/11 Christopher Morrow > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Keegan Holley > wrote: > > The definition of clean is also subjective. There are many who would run > > the IGP only for loopbacks and /30's and force everything into BGP even > at > > small scale. BGP makes it easier to control

Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities

2011-10-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Keegan Holley wrote: > The definition of clean is also subjective.  There are many who would run > the IGP only for loopbacks and /30's and force everything into BGP even at > small scale.  BGP makes it easier to control the routing relationships > between companie

Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities

2011-10-10 Thread Keegan Holley
2011/10/10 Tom Lanyon > Hi all, > > Looking for some advice or experience in a small enterprise / hosting > provider context. > > There's plenty of BCP information around for SPs in the network design > realm, and I'm curious how much of this applies to enterprises too. > Commonly advised items

Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities

2011-10-10 Thread Matt Hite
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Tom Lanyon wrote: > Finally - are there any reasons to avoid running next-hop-self on ibgp > sessions?  The upside is we get to avoid distributing all of our transit/peer > upstream point to point links into the rest of the network.  Again, I > understand this

SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities

2011-10-10 Thread Tom Lanyon
Hi all, Looking for some advice or experience in a small enterprise / hosting provider context. There's plenty of BCP information around for SPs in the network design realm, and I'm curious how much of this applies to enterprises too. Commonly advised items like: * pull-up statics cre