RE: SDSL vs T1 (was Locations with no good Internet)

2010-03-07 Thread George Bonser
> -Original Message- > From: Michael Sokolov [mailto:msoko...@ivan.harhan.org] > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 2:35 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: SDSL vs T1 (was Locations with no good Internet) > > Roy wrote: > > > You missed an option. Just

Re: SDSL vs T1 (was Locations with no good Internet)

2010-03-06 Thread Michael Sokolov
Roy wrote: > You missed an option. Just change to another ISP. I know of at least > one AS701 address block still attached to a company that hasn't been > their customer for ten years or so. How is that possible? AFAIK no local politician has passed an IP address portability law yet. If my

Re: SDSL vs T1 (was Locations with no good Internet)

2010-03-06 Thread Roy
On 3/6/2010 12:23 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote: ... I wanted service from AS701 with a V.35 hand-off; both requirements (the ISP choice and the hand-off type) were/are for sentimental reasons. Speed was/is a lower-priority concern, i.e., I was/am willing to live with sub-T1 speeds if it allows me to

SDSL vs T1 (was Locations with no good Internet)

2010-03-06 Thread Michael Sokolov
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote: > Isn't this really an issue (political) with tariffed T1 prices rather > than a technical problem? Yes, of course. It's even worse if you are tied to one particular ISP (VZB) by non-portable IP addresses. I wanted service from AS701 with a V.35 hand-off; both require