On 2010-01-05, at 07:56, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> I am doing some preliminary work on a potential NANOG presentation
> regarding the differences in IPv6 routing tables presentation from
> various "large" transit providers, because I've seen some oddities in
> announcement variations bet
- IPv6 Routing Table Snapshots
To: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Message-ID: <4b436538.2000...@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
you might take a look at route-views6.routeviews.org
last I looked it had 22 neighbors.
you can either telnet to it
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:joe...@bogus.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:14 AM
> To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Request for Information - IPv6 Routing Table Snapshots
>
> you might tak
you might take a look at route-views6.routeviews.org
last I looked it had 22 neighbors.
you can either telnet to it (it's quagga) or look in the archived ribs here:
http://archive.routeviews.org/route-views6/bgpdata/
Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> Hello Everyone:
>
> I am requesting the as
Hello Everyone:
I am requesting the assistance of operators who are receiving full IPv6
routing tables from upstream, transit providers. If you could send me a
copy of your full IPv6 table, as plain text or whatever format best
suits, I would be sincerely grateful.
I am doing some preliminary wo
5 matches
Mail list logo
