Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:36:27PM -0400, Christian Koch wrote:
i definitely see value in appliances like the fcp and route science box, i
just think for a smaller provider it may not be necessary - or maybe i have
it backwards,and it is a better solution for a smaller pr
If you already own Cisco gear, Cisco OER (which now has another
marketing name) might do the trick without buying any appliances, as
it runs on top of IOS.
Rubens
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Howdy for reasons it might be inappropriate to dis
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:36:27PM -0400, Christian Koch wrote:
> i definitely see value in appliances like the fcp and route science box, i
> just think for a smaller provider it may not be necessary - or maybe i have
> it backwards,and it is a better solution for a smaller provider so they
> don'
gt; >From: Christian Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 2:39 PM
> >To: Robert E. Seastrom
> >Cc: Eric Van Tol; nanog@nanog.org
> >Subject: Re: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
> >
> >agreed. i see the most benefit from th
>From: Christian Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 2:39 PM
>To: Robert E. Seastrom
>Cc: Eric Van Tol; nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
>
>agreed. i see the most benefit from these boxes geared towards networks
agreed. i see the most benefit from these boxes geared towards networks with
critical apps that are latency intensive and more than a handful of transit
providers than i do for a smaller provider..
depending on how many upstreams you're juggling, its not that hard to create
some traffic engineerin
Eric Van Tol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to hire that engineer, please. Can you send me his resume?
> Here's the job description:
>
> - Required to works 24x7x365.
> - Must monitor all network egress points to examine latency,
> retransmissions, packet loss, link utilization, and l
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:25 AM
> To: Drew Weaver
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
>
> Going off this and previous posts, you'd well-serv
what does vyatta have to do with route intelligence/optimization?
vyatta is just a router..
-c
-Original Message-
From: Michienne Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 07/03/08 10:36 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
Have you considered
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Howdy for reasons it might be inappropriate to discuss on this list
> we've decided that we're going to replace our Avaya/RouteScience box and
> we're looking for recommendations on different solutions for 'BGP manage
MO 64116
www.linkcity.org
(816) 412-7990
-Original Message-
From: Drew Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 6:51 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Replacement for Avaya CNA/RouteScience
Howdy for reasons it might be inappropriate to discuss on this
list we'
Howdy for reasons it might be inappropriate to discuss on this list
we've decided that we're going to replace our Avaya/RouteScience box and we're
looking for recommendations on different solutions for 'BGP management
appliances'.
We're aware of the Internap FCP product, but is
12 matches
Mail list logo
