On Jun 13, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:55:37AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
>> If popularity were the measure of relative OS security, then we would
>> expect to see infection rates proportional to deployment rates
>
> I don't buy that premise, or at l
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sullivan
Sent: 06/13/12 07:33 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: vulnerability and popularity (was: EBAY and AMAZON)
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:55:37AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > If popularity
were the measure of relative OS security, then we would > exp
On 13 June 2012 13:33, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:55:37AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> > If popularity were the measure of relative OS security, then we would
> > expect to see infection rates proportional to deployment rates
>
> I don't buy that premise, or at least n
3 matches
Mail list logo
