Same from LACNIC. This would have justify a /44 or separate /48s for
each site.
/as
On 31 Oct 2011, at 12:45, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> Ideally, you should put a /48 at each location.
>
> Speaking from my experience with getting v6 spac
My take on the issue is that your providers are wise in not wanting to
accept prefixes longer than /48s.
You should get multiple prefixes, from the same or different RIRs. If
there are policies in place which do not allow you to do so, I think
it's a good time to discuss them.
regards
Carlos
On
On Nov 1, 2011, at 4:10 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
>
>> case 2: extranet like multiple POPs interconnected with VPNs
>> - get greater then /48 block (like /44) so each POP gets its /48 part
>> - each POP announces its corresponding /48 prefix to t
>
> As for /48 IPv6 blocks being like /24 for IPv4.
> It really seems that /48 may be the most popular PI block and this may
> lead to overcrowding of DFZ. Probably, this is logical consequence of
> getting bigger address space. We needed more IP addresses and we get
> them. Anyway getting greater
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
case 2: extranet like multiple POPs interconnected with VPNs
- get greater then /48 block (like /44) so each POP gets its /48 part
- each POP announces its corresponding /48 prefix to their local ISPs
- decide if you wish that traffic from Internet to
Thanks to everybody who responded.
To summarize it all, these are the guides for non-ISP company to use
PI IPv6 addresses:
case 1: single POP, no plans to have more
- get single /48 from your RIR, announce it to one or multiple ISPs
that POP is connected to
case 1a: multiple separate POPs (no VP
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:39:57 -0400, Richard Barnes
wrote:
Couldn't you also advertise the /48 from all the sites, if you're
willing to sort things out over the inter-site VPNs?
If we're talking about a site-to-site IPsec VPN "over the internet", then
that's a very bad idea. Even if "the in
On Oct 31, 2011, at 12:30 49PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 10/31/11 03:43 , Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> On 2011-10-31 08:56 , Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please advice what is the best practice to use IPv6 address block
>>> across distributed locations.
>>
>> You go to multiple RIRs an
On 10/31/11 03:43 , Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2011-10-31 08:56 , Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please advice what is the best practice to use IPv6 address block
>> across distributed locations.
>
> You go to multiple RIRs and get multiple prefixes.
>
> Heck, you apparently can even get
On 10/31/11 05:59 , Owen DeLong wrote:
> Ideally, you should put a /48 at each location.
>
> Owen
>
> On Oct 31, 2011, at 12:56 AM, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please advice what is the best practice to use IPv6 address block
>> across distributed locations.
>>
>> Recently we obtain
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
Ideally, you should put a /48 at each location.
Speaking from my experience with getting v6 space from ARIN earlier this
year, as long as your documentation is in pretty good order, a /48 per
site is pretty easy to get.
I don't know if the experience
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
The problem we ran across is that ISP in US does not wish to accept
prefixes longer then /48 from us.
Need your advice: is this normal to distribute /48 by /56 parts across
locations or should we obtain separate /48 for each of them? Or maybe
we need
Ideally, you should put a /48 at each location.
Owen
On Oct 31, 2011, at 12:56 AM, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please advice what is the best practice to use IPv6 address block
> across distributed locations.
>
> Recently we obtained our PI /48 from RIPE. The idea was to assign
> part
Not sure about RIPE, but under ARIN, you would qualify for a /44 (or larger if
you have more than 12 sites), out of which you could announce the /48s
independently and as an aggregate, as you wish to do.
-Randy
- Original Message -
> Hello,
>
> Please advice what is the best practic
On 2011-10-31 08:56 , Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please advice what is the best practice to use IPv6 address block
> across distributed locations.
You go to multiple RIRs and get multiple prefixes.
Heck, you apparently can even get multiple disjunct prefixes from the
same RIR.
There w
Couldn't you also advertise the /48 from all the sites, if you're
willing to sort things out over the inter-site VPNs?--Richard
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
>
>> Need your advice: is this normal to distribute /48 by /56 p
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
Need your advice: is this normal to distribute /48 by /56 parts across
locations or should we obtain separate /48 for each of them? Or maybe we
need /32 that can be split into multiple /48? Anyway we are not ISP so
/48 looks quite reasonable and suf
17 matches
Mail list logo
