> Last I heard NANOG stands for North American Network Operators Group.
> Anti-American comments are not welcome here..
LOL
I am only a lurker in this list. I am curious why nobody has
mentioned open source. Theres no way all these router-thingies would
have all his source code visible? a house made of glass?
--
--
ℱin del ℳensaje.
There is more than just y'all's in North America .
---
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: Jeroen Massar
Date:
To: david peahi
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: huawei (ZTE too)
On Jun 13, 2013, at 3:01 PM, "Scott Weeks" wrote:
> On 2013-06-13 14:28, david peahi wrote:
>>
>> Last I heard NANOG stands for North American Network Operators Group.
>> Anti-American comments are not welcome here..
> Smiley? Smiley? I'm looking for the :-) but I don't
> see one. How about "
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:28 PM, david peahi wrote:
> Last I heard NANOG stands for North American Network Operators Group.
> Anti-American comments are not welcome here..
>
>
As a matter of fact, North America includes 23 unique countries, not just
the United States - http://en.wikipedia.org/wik
On 2013-06-13 14:28, david peahi wrote:
>
> Last I heard NANOG stands for North American Network Operators Group.
> Anti-American comments are not welcome here..
-
Smiley? Smiley? I'm looking for the :-) but I don't
see one. How about "crazy eyes"?
On 2013-06-13 14:28, david peahi wrote:
>
> Last I heard NANOG stands for North American Network Operators Group.
> Anti-American comments are not welcome here..
(IMHO there was nothing 'anti-american' about my statement, though I
guess it completely depends on what the definition of that would b
Last I heard NANOG stands for North American Network Operators Group.
Anti-American comments are not welcome here..
David
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2013-06-13 13:01, david peahi wrote:
> > Apologies for making what could be construed as an off topic, political
On 2013-06-13 13:01, david peahi wrote:
> Apologies for making what could be construed as an off topic, political
> comment, but doesn't everyone in the USA know by now that the PRC
> represents a dagger aimed at the economic and national security of America?
> A military invasion in slow motion as
Apologies for making what could be construed as an off topic, political
comment, but doesn't everyone in the USA know by now that the PRC
represents a dagger aimed at the economic and national security of America?
A military invasion in slow motion as it were?
David
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:28
On 6/13/13 3:41 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> > My objection to ZTE/Hauwei when I was at a cellular telco was just this.
>> > I said "there was no way I can agree with Chinese nationals having
>> > unfettered access to our network".
> Why would anyone outside of the US agree to have US produc
Is that also not possibly the case with Cisco, Juniper, XYZ network
equipment vendors? If the Chinese are doing it, I would imagine we (along
with our pals) are doing it as well. It'll be interesting to see what NSA
dox this guy drops in the coming days and weeks ahead. All of the TV
pundits were s
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Bryan Fields wrote:
My objection to ZTE/Hauwei when I was at a cellular telco was just this.
I said "there was no way I can agree with Chinese nationals having
unfettered access to our network".
Why would anyone outside of the US agree to have US products in their
networ
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
> They are playing our love of "But Wait There's More!". Give us everything at
> deep discounts or for free and receive direct access to the core of every
> major telecom company on the planet. For a few hundred million dollars the
> Chinese go
On 6/13/13 1:35 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
> They are a state controlled company. You think the PRC's party members dont
> call the shots? I've been to Beijing for work.. I can assure you the
> government has a very known presence through the private community. Often
> times, graduates of their state
15 matches
Mail list logo
